Skip to main content
Log in

Antibacterial activity of the fourth-generation fluoroquinolones gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin against ocular pathogens

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ideal ophthalmic anti-infective exhibits broad-spectrum activity against grampositive, gram-negative, and atypical bacterial species. These pathogens can cause potentially blinding infections such as keratitis and endophthalmitis, both of which are associated with ophthalmic surgery or traumatic injury. These infections often require aggressive antibacterial therapy, preferably with newer generations of antibiotics. In this study, minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin were determined in vitro against bacterial strains that were isolated from suspected cases of bacterial keratitis and endophthalmitis. The ocular isolates included 7 gram-positive, 4 gram-negative, and 3 atypical bacterial species. Catifloxacin and moxifloxacin exhibited similar activity against 6 grampositive organisms:Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Bacillus cereus, andEnterococcus faecalis. MIC90 values for the drugs against these isolates ranged from 0.08 mg/mL to 0.57 mg/mL and were comparable to previously published values against isolates from patients with systemic infections. The MIC90 for gatifloxacin againstStreptococcus viridans was 0.22 mg/mL compared with 0.73 mg/mL for moxifloxacin (P=.011). Among the gram-negative isolates, the mean MIC90 for gatifloxacin againstPseudomonas aeruginosa was 1.28 mg/mL compared with 2.60 mg/ mL for moxifloxacin (P=.023). MIC90 values for gatifloxacin againstKlebsiella pneumoniae andEnterobacter aerogenes were one fourth to one fifth the values for rnoxifloxacin. For the atypicals, the MIC90 values for gatifloxacin againstNocardia asteroides andMycobacterium chelonae were one fourth the corresponding values for rnoxifloxacin. Gatifloxacin demonstrated a broad spectrum of activity against several key ocular pathogens tested in this study and was at least as effective as moxifloxacin against these pathogens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith A, Pennefather PM, Kaye SB, Hart CA. Fluoroquinolones: place in ocular therapy.Drugs. 2001;61:747–761.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blondeau JM. Gatifloxacin: a new fluoroquinolone.Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2000;9:1877–1895.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Drlica K. Mechanism of fluoroquinolone action.Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999;2:504–508.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Higgins PG, Finit AC, Schmitz FJ. Fluoroquinolones: structure and target sites.Curr Drug Targets. 2003;4:181–190.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fish DN, North DS. Gatifloxacin, an advanced 8-methoxy fluoroquinolone.Pharmacotherapy. 2001; 21:35–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morden NE, Berke EM. Topical fluoroquinolones for eye and ear.Am Fam Physician. 2000;62: 1870–1876.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleiszig SM, Evans DJ. The pathogenesis of bacterial keratitis: studies with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Clin Exp Optom. 2002;85:271–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McLeod SD. Treatment of bacterial keratitis.Compr Ophthalmol Upd. 2001; 217–224.

  9. Sridhar MS, Gopinathan U, Garg P, Sharma S, Rao GN. OcularNocardia infections with special emphasis on the cornea.Surv Ophthalmol. 2001;45:361–378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Karp CL, Tuli SS, Yoo SH, et al. Infectious keratitis after LASIK.Ophthalmology. 2003;110:503–510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Callegan MC, Engelbert M, Parke DW 2nd, Jett BD, Gilmore MS. Bacterial endophthalmitis: epidemiology, therapeutics, and bacterium-host interactions.Clin Micmbiol Rev. 2002;15:111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Irvine WD, Flynn HW Jr, Miller D, Pflugfelder SC. Endophthalmitis caused by Gram-negative organisms.Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:1450–1454.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lomaestro BM. Therapeutic interchange of fluoroquinolones at a medical center.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2001;58:904–907.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Everett SL, Kowalski RP, Karenchak LM, Landsittel D, Day R, Gordon YJ. An in vitro comparison of the susceptibilities of bacterial isolates from patients with conjunctivitis and blepharitis to newer and established topical antibiotics.Cornea. 1995;14:382–387.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Osato MS, Jensen HG, Trousdale MD, et al. The comparative in vitro activity of ofloxacin and selected ophthalmic antimicrobial agents against ocular bacterial isolates.Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:380–386.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mather R, Karenchak LM, Romanowski EG, Kowalski RP. Fourth generation fluoroquinolones: new weapons in the arsenal of ophthalmic antibiotics.Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:463–466.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Donnenfeld ED, O’Brien TP, Solomon R, Perry HD, Speaker MG, Wittpenn J. Infectious keratitis after photorefractive keratectomy.Ophthalmology. 2003;110:743–747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson A, Kremer I, Avisar R, Gaton D, Savir H, Yassur Y. The combination of topical ceftazidime and aminoglycosides in the treatment of refractory pseudomonal keratitis.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237:177–180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Callegan, M.C., Ramirez, R., Kane, S.T. et al. Antibacterial activity of the fourth-generation fluoroquinolones gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin against ocular pathogens. Adv Therapy 20, 246–252 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849853

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849853

Keywords

Navigation