Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone with neomycin/polymyxin/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa pain

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CIP/DEX) and neomycin 0.35%/polymyxin B 10,000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1.0% (NPH) were compared for relief of pain in patients with acute otitis externa. Patients received 7 d of treatment with CIP/DEX twice daily or NPH 3 times daily. Ear pain was assessed by patients/caregivers twice daily and by the study investigator on days 3, 8, and 18 (4-point scale). Higher percentages of CIP/DEX-treated patients had relief of severe pain over time (P=.0013) and relief of significant pain (moderate or severe pain) over time (P=.0456), compared with NPH-treated patients. The percentage of CIP/DEX-treated patients with severe pain decreased rapidly within the first 12 h; this contrasted with an increase in pain among NPH-treated patients. CIP/DEX-treated patients had significantly less inflammation (P=.0043) and edema (P=.0148) than NPH-treated patients. Overall, these results support greater pain relief attained over the first 3 d in patients with acute otitis externa treated with CIP/DEX compared with NPH and a rapid reduction in severe pain after initiation of treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenfeld RM, Brown L, Cannon CR, et al. Clinical practice guideline: acute otitis externa.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 134: S4-S23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hirsch BE. Diseases of the external ear. In: Bluestone CD, Stool SE, Kenna MA, eds.Pediatric Otolaryngology, vol 1, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1996: 379–381.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stroman DW, Roland PS, Dohar J, Burt W. Microbiology of normal external auditory canal.Laryngoscope. 2001; 111: 2054–2059.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roland PS, Stroman DW. Microbiology of acute otitis externa.Laryngoscope. 2002; 112: 1166–1177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marcy M. Swimmer’s ear: timely management tips.Patient Care. 1987; 21: 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schwartz RH. Once-daily ofloxacin otic solution versus neomycin/polymyxin B sulfate/ hydrocortisone otic suspension four times a day: a multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded trial to compare the efficacy, safety, and pain relief in pediatric patients with otitis externa.Curr Med Res Opin. 2006; 22: 1725–1736.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Meikle AW, Tyler FH. Potency and duration of action of glucocorticoids: effects of hydrocortisone, prednisone and dexamethasone on human pituitary-adrenal function.Am J Med. 1977; 63: 200–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cantrill HL, Waltman SR, Palmberg PF, Zink HA, Becker B.In vitro determination of relative corticosteroid potency.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1975; 40: 1073–1077.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter S. Roland MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roland, P.S., Younis, R. & Wall, G.M. A comparison of ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone with neomycin/polymyxin/ hydrocortisone for otitis externa pain. Adv Therapy 24, 671–675 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02848792

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02848792

Keywords

Navigation