Abstract
Van der Waals’ attractive interaction between a neutral atom and a metal surface (semi-infinite jellium) is studied via dielectric response approach in the non-retarded limit. It is shown that the interaction energy can be written in terms of the same form factorF(k, ω), which appears in the formula for dynamic image potential and which depends on the density-density response function of only the metal. The interaction energy written as the change in the zero-point energy of the electromagnetic fluctuations is expressed in terms of a secular determinant whose elements consist of the response function of the metal and the dynamic polarizability of the atom. The usual classical result is obtained when the coupling between the atom and metal is small. In the present analysis, it is shown that for short atom-metal separations, this coupling is important and yields substantial modification over the classical result. Numerical results for such situations are presented for the non-dispersive description of metal and a few inert gas atoms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apell P 1981Phys. Scr. 24 795
Bardeen J 1940Phys. Rev. 58 727
Bruch L W 1983Surf. Sci. 125 194 and references therein
Garcia N, Barker J A and Rieder K H 1983Solid State Commun. 45 567
Gautschi W and Cahill W F 1970Handbook of mathematical functions (eds) M. Abramowitz and I Stegun (New York: Dover) p. 227
Grover P J 1978Phys. Status Solidi B89 K163
Harris J and Liebsch A 1982Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 341
Harris J and Liebsch A 1982J. Phys. C15 2275
Hill N R, Haller M and Celli V 1982Chem. Phys. 73 363
Holmberg C and Apell P 1984Solid State Commun. 49 513 and 1059
Lang N D and Nørskov J K 1983Phys. Rev. B27 4612
Langbein D 1974Theory of van der Waals’ attraction (New York: Springer)
Lennard-Jones J E 1932Trans. Faraday Soc. 28 333
Luntz A, Mattera L, Rocca M, Tommasini F and Valbusa U 1982Surf. Sci. 120 L447
Mahanty J and Ninham B W 1973J. Chem. Phys. 59 6157
Margenau H and Pollard W G 1941Phys. Rev. 60 128
Mason B F, McGreer K and Williams B R 1983Surf. Sci. 130 282
Mehl M J and Schaich W L 1977Phys. Rev. A16 921
Mehl M J and Schaich W L 1980Surf. Sci. 99 553
Mukhopadhyay G 1978Solid State Commun. 28 277
Mukhopadhyay G and Mahanty J 1975Solid State Commun. 16 597
Mukhopadhyay G and Lundqvist S 1978Phys. Scr. 17 69
Perreau J and Lapujoulade J 1982Surf. Sci. 119 L292
Persson B N J and Apell P 1983Phys. Rev. B27 6058
Rao P R and Mukhopadhyay G 1984Solid state Commun. 52 697
Rao P R, Shah C and Mukhopadhyay G 1984Pramana (J. Phys.) 23 119
Shih A 1974Phys. Rev. A9 1507
Shih A, Raskin D and Kusch P 1974Phys. Rev. A9 652
Sunjic M, Toulose G and Lucas A A 1972Solid State Commun. 11 1629
Tang K T, Norbeck J M and Certain P R 1976J. Chem. Phys. 64 3063
Zaremba E and Kohn W 1976Phys. Rev. B13 2270
Zaremba E and Kohn W 1977Phys. Rev. B15 1769
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rao, P.R., Mukhopadhyay, G. Response function approach to van der waals’ interaction between atom and metal surface. Pramana - J Phys 27, 563–573 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02846883
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02846883