Abstract
We present a comparison of high-temperature three-phonon resistivities from the relaxation time methods due to Klemens, Callaway, and Debye, and the variational method due to Leibfried and Schlömann. All the calculations are based upon the same choice of anharmonic crystal potential; and hence the results are suitable for comparison on quantitative basis. We find that the resistivities in increasing order of magnitude come from the methods due to Klemens, Callaway Debye, and Leibfried and Schlömann respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benin D 1972Phys. Rev. B5 2344
Bross H 1962Phys. Status Solidi 2 481
Callaway J 1959Phys. Rev. 113 1046
Dubey K S 1976 aPhys. Rev. B13 1836
Duby K S 1976 bJ. Phys. (France) 37 267
Hamilton R A H and Parrott J E 1969Phys. Rev. 178 1284
Herring C 1954Phys. Rev. 95 954
Jackson H E and Walker C T 1971Phys. Rev. B3 1428
Klemens P G 1951Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A208 108
Klemens P G 1958 inSolid State Phys. (New York: Academic Press) 71
Leibfried G and Schlõmann E 1954Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Goettingen Math. Phyk. Kl. IIa (4) 71
Mikhail I F I and Simons S 1975J. Phys. C 8 3068
Parrott J E 1963Proc. Phys. Soc. 81 726
Parrott J E 1972Proc. Int. Conf. Phonon Scatt. in Solids (Paris) 27
Parrott J E and Stuckes A D 1975 inThermal Conductivity of Solids (London: Pion Ltd.) p. 114 footnote
Roufosse M and Klemens P G 1973Phys. Rev. B7 5379
Sharma P C, Dubey K S and Verma G S 1971Phys. Rev. B4 1306
Simons S 1963Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 82 401
Simons S 1975J. Phys. C8 1147
Srivastava G P 1974Pramāna 3 209
Srivastava G P 1975J. Phys. C8 4147
Srivastava G P 1976Pramāna 6 1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srivastava, G.P. Comparison of high-temperature three-phonon resistivities from different theoretical models. Pramana - J Phys 7, 236–244 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02846484
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02846484