Abstract
The effect of variation of dielectric constant on the relative magnetic field effect in singlet luminescence has been studied using a typical exciplex system at a saturating field. The study indicates strong specificity in the perturbation of the magnetic field effect by alcoholic solvents. In contrast to alcohols where relative singlet magnetic field effect is of the order of 2% only, the magnetic field effect in non-alcoholic medium reaches as high as 9%. Moreover, dielectric constant variation in alcohols yields curves which are distinctly different from those in non-alcoholic media. It turns out that this dependence of magnetic field effect on dielectric constant is similar in all non-alcoholic solvent mixtures. An analytical study based on Hong and Noolandi’s solution of Smoluchowski equation has been made. Derived expressions can interpret experimental curves reasonably well.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell G C and Mozumder A 1972J. Chem. Phys. 56 4079
Abell G C, Mozumder A and Magee J L 1972J. Chem. Phys. 56 5422
Atkins P W 1976Chem. Br. 214
Atkins P W and Lambert T P 1975Annu. Rep. Chem. Soc. A72 67
Basu S, Kundu L and Chowdhury M 1987aChem. Phys. Lett. 141 115
Basu S, Nath D N and Chowdhury M 1987bJ. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. II 83 1325
Basu S, Nath D N and Chowdhury M 1988aJ. Lumin. 40 & 41 252
Basu S, Nath D N and Chowdhury M 1988bProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (India) A54 830
Basu S, Chakraborty T and Chowdhury M 1989aJ. Indian Chem. Soc. 66 599
Basu S, Nath D N and Chowdhury M 1989bChem. Phys. Lett. 161 449
Beecroft R A, Davidson R S, Goodwin D, Pratt J E, Chewter L A and Phillips D A 1982Chem. Phys. Lett. 93 468
Belloni J, Billiau F, Cordier P, Delaire J, Delcourt M O and Magat M 1977Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 63 58
Berlin Yu A 1976Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSR 228 628
Berlin Yu A, Cordier P and Delaire J A 1980J. Chem. Phys. 73 4619
Borsenberger P M, Contois L E and Hoesterey D C 1978J. Chem. Phys. 68 637
Boxer S G, Chidsey C E D and Roelofs M G 1983Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 34 389
Brockelhurst B 1973Chem. Phys. 2 6
Brugger P A, Infelta P P, Braun A M and Gratzel M 1981J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103 320
Buchachenko A L 1976Russ. Chem. Rev. 45 761
Calef D F and Deutch J M 1983Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 34 493
Carapellucci P A and Mauzerall D 1975Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 244 214
Chance B and Devault D (eds) 1979Tunnelling in Biological Systems (New York: Academic Press)
Crawford M K, Wang Y and Eisenthal K B 1981Chem. Phys. Lett. 79 529
Debye P 1942Trans. Electrochem. Soc. 82 265
Deutch J M 1972J. Chem. Phys. 56 6076
Devault D 1980Q. Rev. Biophys. 13 387
Freed J H and Pedersen J B 1976Adv. Magn. Reson. 8 1
Fries P H and Patey G N 1984J. Chem. Phys. 80 6253
Gould I R, Turro N J and Zimmt M B 1984Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 20 1
Hong K M and Noolandi S 1978aJ. Chem. Phys. 68 5163
Hong K M and Noolandi S 1978bJ. Chem. Phys. 68 5172
Hong K M and Noolandi S 1978cJ. Chem. Phys. 69 5026
Hummel A and Infelta P P 1974Chem. Phys. Lett. 24 559
Hynes J T 1985Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 36 573
Libby W F 1977Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 28 105
Ludwig P K 1969J. Chem. Phys. 50 1787
Mauzerall D 1980Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 31 345
Mauzerall D and Ballard S G 1982Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 33 377
Miller J R 1975Science 189 221
Monchik L 1956J. Chem. Phys. 24 381
Montroll E W 1946J. Chem. Phys. 14 202
Mozumder A 1968J. Chem. Phys. 48 1659
Mozumder A 1974J. Chem. Phys. 61 780
Naqui K R, Waldenstrom S and Monk K J 1979J. Chem. Phys. 71 73
Nath D N and Chowdhury M 1984aChem. Phys. Lett. 109 13
Nath D N and Chowdhury M 1984bIndian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 22 687
Nath D N, Basu S and Chowdhury M 1986J. Indian Chem. Soc. 63 56
Nath D N, Basu S and Chowdhury M 1989J. Chem. Phys. (in press)
Newton M and Sutin N 1984Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 35 437
Onsager L 1934J. Chem. Phys. 2 599
Onsager L 1938Phys. Rev. 54 554
Petrov N Kh, Sushin A I and Frankevich E L 1981Chem. Phys. Lett. 82 339
Raaen S and Hemmer P C 1982J. Chem. Phys. 76 2569
Rzad S J and Bakale G 1973J. Chem. Phys. 59 2768
Sagdeev R Z, Salikhov K M and Molin Yu N 1977Russ. Chem. Rev. 46 297
Salikhov K M, Molin Yu N, Sagdeev R Z and Buchachenko A L 1984Spin polarization and magnetic effects in radical reactions (ed.) Yu N Molin (Amsterdam: Elsevier)
Sano H 1983J. Chem. Phys. 78 4423
Sano H and Baird J K 1982J. Chem. Phys. 77 6236
Sano H and Tachiya M 1979J. Chem. Phys. 71 1276
Schulten K and Epstein I R 1979J. Chem. Phys. 71 309
Schulten Z and Schulten K 1977J. Chem. Phys. 66 4616
Staerk H, Künhle W, Treichel R and Weller A 1985Chem. Phys. Lett. 118 19
Steiner U E and Ulrich T 1989Chem. Rev. 89 51
Tachiya M 1978J. Chem. Phys. 69 2375
Tachiya M 1979J. Chem. Phys. 70 238
Turro N J 1983Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 80 609
Turro N J and Kraeutler 1980Acta Chem. Res. 13 369
Waldenstrom S, Naqui K R and Mork K J 1981J. Chem. Phys. 74 6535
Weller A 1967Fast reaction and primary processes in chemical kinetics (ed.) S Claesson (New York: Wiley-Interscience) p. 413
Werner H J, Schulten Z and Schulten K 1977J. Chem. Phys. 67 646
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nath, D.N., Chowdhury, M. Effect of variation of dielectric constant on the magnetic field modulation of exciplex luminescence. Pramana - J Phys 34, 51–66 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02846108
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02846108
Keywords
- Radical pair reactions
- magnetic field effect
- exciplex luminescence
- solvent effect of molecular interactions