Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of barrier type tunnel junction and point contact tunnel junction formed on the same highT c material

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By making a combination of both point contact and barrier type tunnel junctions on a single sample of the highT c superconductor BSCCO (2212) single crystal, we have shown that as the tunneling tip is slowly retracted from the surface a point contact junction gradually evolves from a N-S short to a high resistance tunnel junction. The scaled dynamic conductance (dI/dV) of this point contact tunnel junction becomes almost identical to that of a conventional barrier type tunnel junction and both show a linear dI/dVV curve. The observation implies that at high resistance a point contact junction behaves in the same way as a barrier type tunnel junction. We suggested that the almost linear tunneling conductance obtained in both the cases most likely arises due to an intrinsic characteristic of the surface of the crystal comprising of a mosaic of superconducting regions of the order of a few nanometers. We also conclude that the barrierless (N-S) point contact obtained by piercing the surface oxide layer of the crystal shows Andreev reflection which we suggest as the origin of the zero bias anomaly often observed in point contact junctions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blonder G E, Tinkham M and Klapwijk T M 1982Phys. Rev. B25 4515

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cucolo A M, Valles J M Jr, Dynes R C, Gurvitch M, Phillips J M and Garno J P 1989Physica C161 351

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar A, Adkins C J and Chandler S J 1987J. Phys. 20 L1009

  • Kirtley J R 1990Int. J. Mod. Phys. B4 201

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirtley J R, Tsuei C C, Park S I, Chi C C, Rozen J and Schafer W M 1987Phys. Rev. B35 7216

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Qiang Huang, Zasadzinski J F, Gray K E, Bukowski E D and Ginsberg D M 1989Physica C161 141

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharvin Yu V 1965Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 48 984 (Sov. Phys. JETP 21 655)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivashankar G V and Raychaudhuri A K 1990Pramana - J. Phys. 35 L503

    Google Scholar 

  • Srikanth H and Raychaudhuri A K 1991aPhys. Rev. B (submitted)

  • Srikanth H, Rajeswari M and Raychaudhuri A K 1991aPramana — J. Phys. 36 207

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Srikanth H and Raychaudhuri A K 1991bCryogenics (to appear)

  • Srinivasan R1990 Review article of talk delivered at the discussion meeting on highT c superconductors, Bangalore August 90

  • Wolf E L (ed.) 1985Principles of electron tunneling spectroscopy (Oxford: University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bentum P J M, van Kempen K, van de Leemput L E C and Teunissan P A A 1988Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 369

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller H R and Giaever I 1969Phys. Rev. 182 789

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srikanth, H., Raychaudhuri, A.K. A comparison of barrier type tunnel junction and point contact tunnel junction formed on the same highT c material. Pramana - J Phys 36, 621–627 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02845800

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02845800

Keywords

PACS No.

Navigation