Abstract
The assessment is a key determinant of learning by the students. Validity, reliability, objectivity and practicability are the fundamental attributes of assessment. It is important to understand how a given tool of assessment fares on these criteria. The conventional practical clinical examination consisting of “long”/“short” cases lacks objectivity and reliability. It also has a limited validity because sufficient sampling is not possible. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), on the other hand, is a comprehensive, reliable and objective test, but does not take a holistic view of the patient. Viva-voce often revolves around theory and is highly subjective. Since no single tool of assessment of clinical competence is ideal, a combination of “long”/“short” case (s) with OSCE is suggested as a more rational examination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guilbert JJ.Educational Handbook for Health Personnel. Geneva: WHO Offset Publication No. 15, 1981.
Richardson R.Diploma in Medical Education (Assessment). Centre for Medical Education, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee (Scotland), Dundee: 1988.
Harden RM, Gleeson FA.Assessment of Medical Competence Using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Dundee: ASME Medical Education Booklet. 1979.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paul, V.K. Assessment of clinical competence of undergraduate medical students. Indian J Pediatr 61, 145–151 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02843605
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02843605