Skip to main content
Log in

Net aboveground primary production and soil properties of floating and attached freshwater tidal marshes in the Río de la Plata estuary, Argentina

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the lower delta of the Paraná River, at the head of the Río de la Plata estuary (Argentina), we compared net aboveground primary production (NAPP) and soil properties of the dominant macrophyteScirpus giganteus (Kunth) in a floating and an attached marsh community. Both marshes are tidally influenced but in different ways. The floating marsh site is relatively isolated from tidal influences because its ability to float makes it resistant to overland flow and to sediment inputs from the estuary. The attached marsh lacks the capacity to float and receives sediment supplies from the estuary through overland flow. These hydrologic differences are reflected in lower mineral content in sediments of the floating marsh. Using a leaf tagging technique, estimated NAPP was 1,109 ± 206 g m−2 yr−1 for the floating marsh and 1,866 ±258 g m−2 yr−1 for the attached marsh. We attribute the lower NAPP of the floating marsh to isolation from sediment input from overland flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bonfils, C. 1962. Los suelos del Delta del Río Paraná. Factores generadores, clasificacion y uso.Revista Investigación Agrícola INTA 16:257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, M. M. 1993. Changes in the functioning of wetlands along environmental gradients.Wetlands 13:65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon, D. R. andJ. C. Stevenson. 1986. Production, predation, and decomposition in a low-salinityHibiscus marsh.Ecology 67: 1341–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, G. M., H. C. Duthie, andW. D. Taylor. 1997. Models of aquatic plant productivity: A review of the factors that influence growth.Aquatic Botany 59:195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T., P. L. Wiberg, andT. G. Milligan. 2000. Flow and sediment transport on a tidal salt marsh surface.Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 50:315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, J. K. andM. S. Fennesy. 2001. Wetland Plants: Biology and Ecology. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alessio, S., P. Herrera, B. Lartigau, andG. Aprile. 2006. Relevamiento inicial de los embalsados del área núcleo de la Reserva de Biosfera Delta del Paraná. Technical Report. ACEN (Asociación para la Conservación y Estudio de la Naturaleza), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alessio, S., D. Varela, F. Gagliardi, B. Lartigau, G. Aprile, C. ónaco, andS. Heinonen Fortabat. 2001. Ficha técnica Ciervo de los Pantanos, p. 95–113.In C. Dellafiore and N. Maceira (eds.), Los Ciervos Autóctonos de Argentina y la Acción del Hombre. Grupo Abierto de Comunicación, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alessio, S., D. Varela, B. Lartigau, F. Gagliardi, G. Aprile, andC. Monaco. 2002. Primera Etapa Proyecto Ciervo de los Pantanos. Final Report. ACEN (Asociación para la Conserva- ción y Estudio de la Naturaleza), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depetris, P. J. andJ. E. Paolini. 1991. Biogeochemical aspects of South American rivers: The Paraná and the Orinoco, p. 105- 125.In E. T. Degens, S. Kempe, and J. E. Richey (eds.), Biogeochemistry of Major World Rivers. Wiley, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Framinan, M. B. andO. B. Brown. 1996. Study of the Rio de la Plata turbidity front: Part I. Spatial and temporal distribution.Continental Shelf Research 16:1259–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Framiñan, M. B., M. P. Etala, E. M. Acha, R. A. Guerrero, C. A. Lasta, andO. B. Brown. 1999. Physical characteristics and processes of the Río de la Plata estuary, p. 161–194.In G. M. E. Perillo, M. C. Piccolo, and M. Pino-Quivira (eds.), Estuaries of South America: Their Geomorphology and Dynamics. Springer, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosselink, J. G. andR. E. Turner. 1978. The Role of hydrology in freshwater wetland ecosystems, p. 63–78.In R. E. Good, D. F. Whigham, and R. L. Simpson (eds.), Freshwater Wetlands: Ecological Processes and Management Potential. Academic Press Inc, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, Jr.,G. O., C. E. Sasser, G. W. Peterson, andE. M. Swenson. 2000. Vertical movement and substrate characteristics of oligohaline marshes near a high-sediment, riverine system.Journal of Coastal Research 16:164–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson, C. S., J. G. Gosselink, andR. T. Parrondo. 1980. Production of coastal Louisiana marsh plants calculated from phenometric techniques.Ecology 61:1090–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iriondo, M. and E. Scotta. 1978. The evolution of the Paraná River delta, p. 405-418.In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Coastal Evolution in the Quaternary, San Pablo, Brasil.

  • Kandus, P. andA. I. Malvárez. 2004. Vegetation patterns and change analysis in the Lower Delta islands of the Paraná River (Argentina).Wetlands 24:620–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugo, A. E., S. Brown, andM. M. Brinson. 1990. Concepts in wetland ecology, p. 53–85.In A. E. Lugo, M. M. Brinson, and S. Brown (eds.), Forested Wetlands: Ecosystems of the World. Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, C. andR. E. Hughes. 1968. Methods for the measure- ment of the primary production of grassland. International Biological Program Handbook No. 6. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J. andJ. G. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands, 3rd edition. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J., J. R. Taylor, andK. B. Benson. 1991. Estimating primary productivity of forested wetland communities in different hydrologic landscapes.Landscape Ecology 5:75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, T. 1949. The Muskrat in the Louisiana Coastal Marshes. Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orfeo, O. andJ. Stevaux. 2002. Hydraulic and morphological characteristics of middle and upper reaches of the Paraná River (Argentina and Brazil).Geomorphology 44:309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, M. C. andG. M. E. Perillo. 1999. Estuaries of Argentina: A review, p. 101–132.In G. M. E. Perillo, M. C. Piccolo, and M. Pino Quivira (eds.), Estuaries of South America: Their Geomorphology and Dynamics. Environmental Science Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratolongo, P. 2005. Dinámica de comunidades herbáceas del Bajo Delta del río Paraná sujetas a diferentes régimenes hidrológicos y su monitoreo mediante sensores remotos. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratolongo, P., R. Vicari, P. Kandus, andI. Malvarez. 2005. A new method for evaluating net aboveground primary pro- duction (NAPP) ofScirpus giganteus (Kunth).Wetlands 25:228–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R.J. 1942. Flotant.Geographical Review 32:74–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasser, C. E. andJ. G. Gosselink. 1984. Vegetation and primary production in a floating freshwater marsh in Louisiana.Aquatic Botany 20:245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasser, C. E., J. G. Gosselink, andG. P. Shaffer. 1991. Distribution of nitrogen and phosphorus in a Louisiana freshwater floating marsh.Aquatic Botany 41:317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasser, C. E., J. G. Gosselink, E. M. Swenson, C. M. Swarzenski, andN. C. Leibowitz. 1996. Vegetation, substrate and hydrology in floating marshes in the Mississippi river delta plain wetlands, USA.Vegetatio 122:129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smalley, A. E. 1959. The role of two invertebrate populations,Littorina irrorata andOrchelimum fidicinum in the energy flow of a salt marsh ecosystem. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarzenski, C., E. M. Swenson, C. E. Sasser, andJ. G. Gosselink, 1991. Marsh mat flotation in the Louisiana delta plain.Journal of Ecology 79:999–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trefrey, J. H., S. Metz, T. A. Nelson, R. P. Trocine, andB. J. Eadie. 1994. Transport of particulate organic carbon by the Mississippi River and its fate in the Gulf of Mexico.Estuaries 17: 839–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, J. R. andN. W. Lanfredi. 1996. A hydrodynamic model for the Río de la Plata, Argentina.Journal of Coastal Research 12:430–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegert, R. G. andE. C. Evans. 1964. Primary production and the disappearance of the dead vegetation on an old field in southeastern Michigan.Ecology 45:49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. 1998. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edition. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Pratolongo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pratolongo, P., Kandus, P. & Brinson, M.M. Net aboveground primary production and soil properties of floating and attached freshwater tidal marshes in the Río de la Plata estuary, Argentina. Estuaries and Coasts: J ERF 30, 618–626 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02841959

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02841959

Keywords

Navigation