Skip to main content
Log in

Project lifescape

3. GenusFicus

  • Departments
  • Classroom
  • Published:
Resonance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Suggested Reading

  1. J D Hooker,Flora of British India, Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh (Repr.), Dehradun, 5, 494–537, 1885.

  2. P Kathuria and K N Ganeshaiah, Fig-pollinator interactions: Evolutionary tug of war?,The Botanica, 7–10, 1995.

  3. P Kathuria, N K Ganeshaiah, R Uma Shaanker and R Vasudeva, Is there dimorphism for style lengths in monoecious figs?Current Science, 68, 1047–1049, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A Patel, M Hossaert-McKey and D McKey, Ficus-Pollinator research in India: Past, Present and Future,Current Science, 65, 243–252, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A Patel, Phenological patterns ofFicus in relation to other forest trees in southern India,Journal of Tropical Ecology, 13, 681–695, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R Vidya Athreya, The Strangler Figs,Resonance, Vol.2, No.7, 1997.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Utkarsh, G., Almeida, M.R. Project lifescape. Reson 4, 90–100 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02838678

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02838678

Keywords

Navigation