Footnotes
A. Overhauser:Phys. Rev.,91, 476 (1953);92, 411 (1953).
T. R. Carver andC. P. Slichter:Phys. Rev.,92, 212 (1953);102, 975 (1956) A quite different approach to the concept of temperature in the Overhauser effect has been developed bySlichter who shows that in a properly chosen rotating system, the nucleus and electron can be regarded as having the same temperature (Phys. Rev.,99, 1822 (1955)).
Cf.F. Bloch:Phys. Rev.,93, 944 (1954) and the interesting experiments ofI. Solomon on the controlled or generalized Overhauser effect (Phys. Rev.,99, 559 (1955)).
H. B. G. Casimir andF. K. du Pré:Physica,5, 507 (1938).
N. Bloembergen andS. Wang:Phys. Rev.,93, 72 (1954).
N. Bloemnergen: Thesis, «Nuclear Paramagnetic Relaxation», Leiden, 1948, p. 40. HereBloembergen considers transitions caused by dipolar interaction rather than those caused by radiation, but the adaptation to our case is immediate.
L. J. F. Broer:Physica,17, 531 (1951). In this articleBroer discusses the concept of adiabatic susceptibility in considerable detail.
F. W. de Vrijer andC. J. Gorter:Physica,18, 549 (1952).
E. M. Purcell andR. V. Pound:Phys. Rev.,81, 279 (1951).
N. F. Ramsey:Phys. Rev.,103, 20 (1956).
R. V. Pound:Phys. Rev.,81, 156 (1951).
N. F. Ramsey andR. V. Pound:Phys. Rev.,81, 278 (1951).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Vleck, J.H. The concept of temperature in magnetism. Nuovo Cim 6 (Suppl 3), 1081–1100 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02834710
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02834710