Skip to main content
Log in

East-West differentials in congenital malformations in India

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A survey of the congenitally anomalous babies revealed the incidence to be 2.08% at birth in 1774 births from 1736 mothers who delivered in Banaras Hindu University Hospital during a period of 12 months (1978–79). The congenital anomalies were significantly more (p< 0.01) in still borns (6.6%) as compared to live borns (1.9%). Of the 32 live born anomalous babies, 34% were premature. A marked geographical difference in the incidence of malformed babies from East to West was noted (0.31% to 3.6%). The musculoskeletal system was most frequently involved followed by gastrointestinal system and C.N.S. Various factors like mother’s age, parity, sex of the newborn, parents’ socioeconomic status and prematurity, in relation to incidence of malformation are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Czeizei A: Surveillance of congenital anomalies in Hungary. Acta Paediatrica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 17: 123, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson MM, Fortor JO: Congenital malformations at birth. Their association in the same patient. Develop Med Child Neurol 11: 3, 1969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Verma IC: Medical Genetics in India, Vol. I. Auroma Enterprises. Pondicherry p. 5, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saifullah S, Chandra IC, R.K., Pathak Dhal CI: Congenital malformations in new born: A prospective longitudinal study. Indian Pediatr 4: 251, 1967

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mathur BC, Karan S, Vijayadevi KK: Congenital malformation in new borns. Indian Pediatr 12: 179, 1975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mc Intosh RR, Merrit KK, Richard MR, Samuel MH, Bellows MT: The incidence of congenital malformations—A study of 5964 pregnancies. Pediatrics 14: 505, 1954

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ghosh S, Bali L: Malformations in the new born. Indian J Child Health 12: 448, 1963

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Khanna KK, Prasad LN: Congenital malformations in the new born. Indian J Pediatr 4: 251, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carter CO: Maternal states in relation to congenital malformations. J Obst & Gynae Brit Empire 57: 897, 1960

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shapiro RN, Eddy W, Fitzgibhew J, O’Brien G: Incidence of congenital anomalies discovered in neonatal period. Amer J Surg 96: 396, 1958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gentry JT, Parkhurst E, Bulin GVJP: Epidemiological study ofcongenital malformations in New York State. Amer J Pub Hlth 49: 497, 1959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Simpkiss M, Lowe A: Congenital abnormalities in the African Newborn. Arch Dis Child 36: 404, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nair NS, Mathai EM: Congenital malformations in the newborn at Calicut. Antiseptic 51: 823, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crosse MV: Premature Baby. Churchill, London, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marden MP, David W, Smith MC, Donald MJ; Congenital anomalies in the newborn infant. J Ped 64: 357, 1964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chinara, P.K., Singh, S. East-West differentials in congenital malformations in India. Indian J Pediatr 49, 325–329 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02834415

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02834415

Key Words

Navigation