Skip to main content
Log in

Cavitation erosion of hydraulic turbine steels containing 0.2 pct carbon and 1 pct Mn

  • Published:
Journal of Materials for Energy Systems

Abstract

A vibratory ultrasonic apparatus has been used to study the cavitation erosion resistance of 0.2 pct C steels used in the construction of large hydraulic turbines. In the “fabricate weld” technology the final normalizing operation improves the brittle fracture resistance, thereby improving the reliability of the turbine over that of the stress relieved machine. However, normalizing improves the cavitation erosion resistance of some steels only, while a slight degradation occurs in the case of others. Materials properties such as fracture toughness, Charpy impact energy, average grain size, and strain energy to fracture were found to have no relationship to the cavitation erosion resistance of the material. In the range of microstructures observed in hydraulic turbines, the cavitation erosion resistance is determined by the ultimate resilience, i.e., a high ultimate tensile stress is associated with a low cavitation erosion rate. The mechanism of material removal consists of plastic deformation and ductile rupture. Twinning and brittle fracture do not play a significant role in the cavitation erosion of these steels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Akhtar and N. W. Brodie:Journal of Materials for Energy Systems, 1980, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Schulmeister:Proc. 1st International Conference on Rain Erosion, A.A. Fyall, ed., p. 95, Royal Aircraft Establishment, U.K., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E.H.R. Wade and CM. Preece:Metall. Trans. 1978, vol. 9A, p. 1299.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. V. Rao, C. S. Martin, B. C. S. Rao, and N. S. L. Rao:ASTM Jour-nal of Testing and Evaluation, 1981, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Simoneau and R. Roberge: “Cavitation Erosion in Fluid Systems”,ASME, W.L. Swift and R. A. Arndt, eds., 1981, p. 71.

  6. C.M. Preece, “Treatise on Materials Science and Technology-Erosion”, C. M. Preece, ed., 1979, vol. 16, p. 249, Academic Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. J. Heathcock, B.E. Protheroe, and A. Ball: “Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Strength of Metals and Alloys”, P. Haasenet al, eds, 1980, vol. I, p. 219, Pergamon Press.

  8. B. Vyas and C.M. Preece:Metall. Trans., 1972, vol. 8A, p. 915.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Thiruvengadam and S. Waring:J. Ship Res., 1967, vol. 10, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.M. Hobbs: ASTM STP 408 “Erosion by Cavitation or Impinge-ment”, 1967, p. 159.

  11. J.W. Tichler, J.B. van den Elsen, and A.W.J. de Gee:Journal of Lubrication Technology, Series F, Trans. ASME, 1970, vol. 92, p. 220.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. A. Woodford:Metall. Trans. 1972, vol. 3, p. 1137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akhtar, A., Stowell, V.A. Cavitation erosion of hydraulic turbine steels containing 0.2 pct carbon and 1 pct Mn. JMES 4, 58–63 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02833382

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02833382

Keywords

Navigation