Skip to main content
Log in

Does measurement of systolic blood pressure with a pulse oximeter correlate with conventional methods?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pulse oximeter is commonly used in the operating room. We evaluated the use of a pulse oximeter to monitor systolic blood pressure in 20 healthy volunteers and 42 anesthetized patients. We compared the pulse oximeter method of measuring systolic blood pressure with the cuff methods using Korotkoff sounds and Doppler ultrasound as well as with direct pressure measurement through an intraarterial cannula. Systolic blood pressure values obtained by pulse oximeter correlated well with values obtained by other conventional methods. The best correlation was found with Doppler ultrasound (r = 0.996) and the worst with arterial cannulation (r = 0.880). We conclude that this method can be used intraoperatively to measure systolic blood pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoshiya I, Shimada Y, Tanaka K. Spectrophotometric monitoring of arterial oxygen saturation in the fingertip. Med Biol Eng Comput 1980;18:27–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yelderman M, New W Jr. Evaluation of pulse oximetry. Anesthesiology 1983;59:349–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirkendall WM. Feinleib M, Freis ED, Mark AL. Recommendations for human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometers. Dallas: American Heart Association, 1980:1146A-1155A (AHA Committee Report 70-019-B)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lawson D, Norley I, Korbon G, et al. Blood flow limits and pulse oximeter signal detection. Anesthesiology 1987;67:599–603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gardner RM. Direct blood pressure measurement-dynamic response requirements. Anesthesiology 1981;54:227–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gravenstein JS, Paulus DA. Monitoring practice in clinical anesthesia. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1982:37–88

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wallace C, Baker D, Alpert C, et al. Comparison of blood pressure measurement by Doppler and by pulse oximetry techniques. Anesth Analg 1987;66:1018–1019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Bergen FH, Weatherhead DS, Treloar AE, et al. Comparison of indirect and direct methods of measuring arterial blood pressure. Circulation 1954;10:481–490

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bruner JMR, Krenis LJ, Kunsman JM, Sherman AP. Comparison of direct and indirect methods of measuring arterial blood pressure. Med Instrum 1981;14:182–188

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hamilton WF, Dow P. An experimental study of the standing waves in the pulse propagated through the aorta. Am. J Physiol 1939;125:48–59

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Talke, P., Nichols, R.J. & Traber, D.L. Does measurement of systolic blood pressure with a pulse oximeter correlate with conventional methods?. J Clin Monitor Comput 6, 5–9 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832176

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832176

Key Words

Navigation