Conclusion
Which is the better choice: general item bank software or a word processor program? Your answer is dependent upon your computer skills, the amount of test development work you do, and the nature of investment your school is willing to make for software. Both have their relative strengths and weaknesses. The trade-offs between the two approaches are real, important, and in time will probably favor the item bank software.
At the moment, however, we recommend a good word processing program for most teachers. What can you expect the future to bring? At a minimum, test preparation options will continue to expand and improve. We suggested earlier that the technology is changing rapidly. For example even now you can place a printed copy of test items into an optical character recognition (OCR) scanner (similar to a photocopy machine) and read the items into a digital form which either a word processor or a test generator can use. Instead of having to type your collection of test items before selecting, editing, and printing them, the computer will read them from the paper.
This new scanning technology, unfortunately, requires expensive software, powerful microcomputers, and the scanner itself costs over $1000. In addition, the accuracy of the character recognition is not perfect—especially with less than the ideal printed copy from which to work. It will be years before most of us have ready access to this technology. Even better options will be available, however, don’t wait for the next major breakthrough. There will always be another breakthrough on the horizon. You can start improving your test development process now
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Diploma II. (1988) Brownstone Research Group, Inc. 140 West Eleventh Avenue Denver, CO 80204.
Gullickson, A. (1982, November). The practice of testing in elementary and secondary schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 229 391).
Hsu, T., & Sadock, S. (1985).Computer-assisted Test Construction: The State of the Art. ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation, Princeton, N.J.
Naccarato, R. (1988, January).A guide to item banking in education: Item bank data sheets (3rd ed.). Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory Portland, OR.
Nitko, A. & Hsu, T. (1984). A comprehensive microcomputer system for classroom testing.Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(4), 371–391.
Nitko, A.(Ed.). (1989, Fall). Special issue on computer applications to testing: Review of recent research and developments.Educational Measurement Issues and Practice.
The Educational Software Selector (T.E.S.S.). (1987). Water Mill, NY: EPIE Institute.
Sturtevant, V. & Johnson, B. (1988, January). Micro-computer test-generation systems: A software review.Teaching Sociology, 16 49–54.
Traub, R. (1984, Winter).Journal of Educational Measurement 1(4).
Womer, F. (1984, Summer).Educational Measurement Issues and Practice,3(2).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gullickson, A., Farland, D. Using micros for test development. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 35, 22–26 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832083
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832083