We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Remarks onB(H) ⊗B(H)

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

  • Published:
Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences - Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We review the existing proofs that the min and max norms are different onB(H) ⊗B(H) and give a shortcut avoiding the consideration of non-separable families of operator spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Connes A, On the cohomology of operator algebras,J. Funct. Anal. 28(2) (1978) 248–253

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Haagerup U, All nuclear C*-algebras are amenable.Invent. Math. 74(2) (1983) 305–319

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Haagerup U, Injectivity and decomposition of completely bounded maps, in: Operator algebras and their connection with topology and ergodic theory, Springer Lecture Notes in Math. 1132 (1985) pp. 170–222

  4. Haagerup U, Self-polar forms, conditional expectations and the weak expectation property forC*-algebras, unpublished manuscript (1995)

  5. Haagerup U and Thorbjørnsen S, A new application of random matrices: Ext (C *red (F2)) is not a group,Ann. Math. 162 (2005) 711–775

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Junge M and Pisier G, Bilinear forms on exact operator spaces andB(H) ⊗B(H). Geometric and Funct. Anal. (GAFA J.)5 (1995) 329–363

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kadison R and Ringrose J, Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras, vol. II, Advanced Theory (New York: Academic Press) (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lance C, On nuclearC*-algebras.J. Funct. Anal. 12 (1973) 157–176

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ozawa N, An application of expanders to\(\mathbb{B}\),J. Funct. Anal. 198 (2003) 499–510

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Pisier G, Introduction to operator space theory, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 294, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) (2003) pp. viii + 478

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pisier G, Quadratic forms in unitary operators,Linear Algebra Appl. 267 (1997) 125–137

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Takesaki M, Theory of Operator Algebras I (New York: Springer-Verlag) (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Valette A, An application of Ramanujan graphs toC*-algebra tensor products.Discrete Math. 167/168 (1997) 597–603

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Wassermann S, On tensor products of certain groupC*-algebras.J. Funct. Anal. 23 (1976) 239–254

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University, 77843-3368, College Station, TX, USA

    Gilles Pisier

  2. Equipe d’Analyse, Universite Paris VI, Case 186, 75252, Paris Cedex 05, France

    Gilles Pisier

Authors
  1. Gilles Pisier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pisier, G. Remarks onB(H) ⊗B(H) . Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) 116, 423–428 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829700

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829700

Keywords

Search

Navigation