Skip to main content
Log in

Comparisons of constitutive models for anisotropic soils

  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Constitutive modeling is a method by which anisotropy, one of the important affecting factors on the behavior of natural soils, could be properly simulated. In this research, three anisotropic constitutive models with comparative theories and model parame ters (anisotropic modified Cam-Clay model, Banerjee model, and bounding surface model) were formulated in a frame of finite strain, to predict the cone penetration test results. The prediction by each constitutive model was investigated and compared with the experimental result. The influence of the model parameters was theoretically and practically identified. The model predictions generally showed good agreement with the experimental results in cone resistance profile (8≈10% difference for OCR=1 specimen and 10≈17% difference for OCR=10 specimen), which is due to the model capacity and finite strain formulation as well as the homogeneity of the artificially prepared soil specimen and axisymmetric condition (no full anisotropy); however, the effort to reduce the number of parameter, with keeping the capacity of the model, is needed in the practical purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anandarajah, A. and Dafalias, Y.F. (1986). “Bounding Surface Plasticity. III: Application to Anisotropic Cohesive Soils.”J. of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 112, No. 12, pp. 1292–1318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anandarajah, A. and Kuganenthira, N. (1995). “Some Aspects of Fabric Anisotropy of Soils.”Geotechnique, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, P.K., Stipho, A.S., and Yousif, N.B. (1984). “A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of the Behavior of Anisotropically Consolidated Clays in Development in Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.” Vol. 2, Applied Science Publishers, London, England, pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, P.K., Kumbhojkar, A.S., and Yousif, N.B. (1988). “Finite Element Analysis of the Stability of a Vertical Cut using an Anisotropic Soil Model.”Canadian Geotechnical J., Vol. 25, pp. 119–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, P.K. and Yousif, N.B. (1986). “A Plasticity Model for the Mechanical Behavior of Anisotropically Consolidated Clay.”Int. J. for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 10, pp. 521–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathe, K.J. (1990).Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanella, R.G. and Robertson, P.K. (1981).Applied cone study in cone penetration testing and experience, ed. R. M. Norris and R. D. Holtz. ASCE, New York, NY, pp. 343–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafalias, Y.F. (1987).An Anisotropic Critical State Clay Plasticity Model, Constitutive Laws for Engineering Materials: Theory and Applications, Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc., pp. 513–521.

  • Dafalias, Y.F. and Popov, E.P. (1975). “A Model of Nonlinear Hardening Materials for Complex Loading.”Acta Mechanica, Vol. 21, pp. 173–192.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hashigucihi, K. (1979). “Constitutive Equations of Granular Media with an Anisotropic Hardening.”3rd Int. Conference of Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Aachen, 2–6, pp. 435–439.

  • Ishikawa, H. and Sasaki, K. (1998). “Deformation induced anisotropy and memorized back stress in constitutive model.”Int. J. of Plasticity, No. 4, pp. 627–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaliakin, V.N. and Dafalias, Y.F. (1990). “Verification of the Elastoplastic-Viscoplastic Bounding Surface Model for Cohesive Soils.”Soils and Foundations, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieg, R.D. and Brown, K.H. (1996). “Anisotropic Plasticity with Anisotropic Hardening and Rate Dependence.”J. of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 122, No. 4, pp. 316–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lade, P.V. and Andrei, V.A. (2003). “Effects of Cross Anisotropy on Three-Dimensional Behavior of Sand. II: Volume Change Behavior and Failure.”J. of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 129, No. 2, pp. 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lade, P.V., Yamamuro, J.A., Ghaboussi, J., and Inel, S. (1994). “Experimental Determination of Constitutive Behaviour of Soils.”Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Siriwardane & Zaman (eds), pp. 215–222.

  • Levadoux, J.N. and Baligh, M.M. (1980). “Pore Pressure during Cone Penetration in Clays.” MIT, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Report No. R. 80-15, 310 pp.

  • Lim, B-S. (1999).Determination of consolidation characteristics in fine grained soils evaluated by piezocone tests. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, H.I., Yue, D., Kaliakin, V.N., and Themelis, N.J. (2002). “Anisotropic Elastoplastic Bounding Surface Model for Cohesive Soils.”J. of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 128, No. 7, pp. 748–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macari, E.J., Hoyos, L.R., and Arduino, P. (2003). “Constitutive modeling of unsaturated soil behavior under axisymmetric stress states using a stress/suction-controlled cubical test cell.”Int. J. of Plasticity, No. 2, pp. 1481–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prevost, J.H. (1978a). “Anisotropic Undrained Stress-Strain Behaviour of Clays.”J. of the Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 104, No. GT8, pp. 1075–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevost, J.H. (1978b). “Plasticity Theory for Soil Stress-Strain Behaviour.”J. of the Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 104, No. EM5, pp. 1177–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, Y.S., Saunders, F.I., and Wagoner, R.H. (1996). “Anisotropic yield functions with plastic-strain-induced anisotropy.”Int. J. of Plasticity, No. 3, pp. 417–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voyiadjis, G.Z. and Kattan, P.I. (1989). “Eulerian Constitutive Model for Finite Deformation Plasticity with Anisotropic Hardening.”Mechanics of Materials, Vol. 7, pp. 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wroth, C.P. (1984). “The Interpretation of In Situ Soil Tests.”Geotechnique, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 449–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dae Kyu Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, D.K. Comparisons of constitutive models for anisotropic soils. KSCE J Civ Eng 8, 403–409 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829164

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829164

Keywords

Navigation