Abstract
An iterative dynamic condensation method for the model reduction is presented in this paper. Dynamic condensation method has been widely applied to large finite element models for faster computation of the natural frequencies and mode shapes. It has also been used in correlation of test-analysis models, vibration control, and structural dynamic optimization. Based on the subspace iteration method, an iterative dynamic condensation technique is employed. The proposed method has three advantages compared with other iterative schemes proposed in the past: (1) The convergence is much faster than all these methods, especially when the eigenpairs of the reduced model are close to those of the full model. (2) Since the dynamic condensation matrix is independent of the eigenpairs of the reduced model, it is unnecessary to calculate the stiffness and mass matrices in every iteration. (3) The convergence of the iterative scheme can be proved simply. Two iteration schemes, which are based on the convergence of the eigenvalues of the reduced model, are introduced. Numerical examples are presented to verify the effectiveness of this technique.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alk, F.A., Dilger, W.H., and Irons, B.M. (1982). “Acceleration of subspace iteration.”Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., Vol. 18, pp. 583–589.
Bathe, K.J. (1971). “Solution methods for large generalized eigenvalue problem in structural engineering.” UC SESM Report 17-20, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Bathe, K.J. and Wilson, E.L. (1972). “Large eigenvalue problems in dynamic analysis.”ASCE: J. Eng. Mech. Div98, pp. 1471–1485.
Bathe, K.J. and Ramaswamy, S. (1980). “An accelerated subspace iteration method.”Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng., Vol. 23, pp. 313–331.
Friswell, M.I., Garvey, S.D. and Penny, J.E.T. (1995). “Model reduction using dynamic and iterated IRS techniques.”Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 186, pp. 311–323.
Friswell, M.I., Garvey, S.D., and Penny, J.E.T. (1997). “Using Iterated IRS Model Reduction Techniques to Calculate Eigensolutions.”Proceedings of the 15th International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, pp. 1537–1543.
Guyan, R.J. (1965). “Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices.”AIAA Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, p. 380.
Irons, B. (1965). “Structural eigenvalue problems-elimination of unwanted variables.”AIAA Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 961–962.
Mills, J.K. and Ing, J.G.L. (1996). “Dynamic modeling and control of a multi-robot system for assembly of flexible payloads with applications to automotive body assembly.”Journal of Robotic Systems, Vol. 13, pp. 817–836.
O'Callahan, J.C. (1989). “A Procedure for an Improved Reduced System (IRS) Model.”Proceedings of the 7th International Modal Analysis Conference, Las Vegas, Neveda, USA, pp. 17–21.
Qu, Z.Q. and Fu, A.F. (1998). “New structural dynamic condensation method for finite element models.”AIAA Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 1320–1324.
Singh, M.P. and Suarez, L.E. (1992). “Dynamic condensation with synthesis of substructure eigenproperties.”Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 159, pp. 139–155.
Suarez, L.E. and Singh, M.P. (1992). “Dynamic condensation method for structural eigenvalue analysis.”AIAA Journal, Vol. 30, pp. 1046–1054.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jung, YK., Qu, ZQ. & Jung, DS. Structural dynamic condensation method with an iterative scheme. KSCE J Civ Eng 8, 205–211 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829120
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829120