Skip to main content
Log in

Categorical relationship approach as an alternative risk analysis for predicting cost contingency

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Construction projects manifest more risks than do other industries. Often, firms doing business in construction markets find these risks intimidating. For mitigating this risky nature of construction project, risk analysis tools and procedures have been proposed for many years. However, one of key problems with present-day risk analysis methods is that those procedures are basically mathematical or probability-oriented approaches, which easily become complex to capture the relations between the highly interrelated various variables. This paper presents the use of categorical relationship-based approach to predict the cost contingency in the early stage of a bidding process. A case study is performed to demonstrate the approach, which allows complex cost risk analysis to be performed effectively for the every day users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alarcon, L.F. (1992).Project Performance Modeling: A Methodology for Evaluating Project Execution Strategies, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemen, R.T. (1998).Making Hard Decisions: an introduction to decision analysis-2nd edition, Brooks/Cole Publishing, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. and Chapman, C. (1987).Risk Analysis for Large Projects, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R.M. (1988).Rational Choice in an Uncertain World, Harcourt Brace College Publisher, Orlando, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, J.E., Sewester, E.E., and Taher, K. (1988).Risk Management in Capital Projects, Report to CII, Austin, Texas, USA.

  • Diekmann, J.E. (1992). “Risk Analysis: Lessons From Artificial Intelligence.”International Journal of Project Management, Butterworth-Heinemann, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, R. and Norman, G. (1993).Risk Management and Construction, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T. and Hayward, H. (1968). “Initial Experiments with the Cross-Impact Method of Forecasting.”Futures, IPC Science and Technology Press, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 100–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, S. (1998).Practical Risk Assessment for Project management, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S.H. and Diekmann, J.E. (2001). “Making a Risk-based Bid Decision for Overseas Construction Projects.”Construction management and economics, E & FN Spon, Vol. 19, No. 8, pp. 765–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, D.B. and Tomas, H. (1983).Risk Analysis and its Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honton, E.J., Stacey, G.S., and Millet, S.M. (1985).Future Scenarios: The BASICS Computational Method, Battelle, Columbus Division, Ohio, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M.G. and Henrion, M. (1990).Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • PMI. (1992).Project and Program Risk Management: A Guide to Managing Project Risk and Opportunities. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G. and Pearl, J. (1990).Readings in Uncertainty Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, Calif., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, K. (1984).Project Financing and Risk Minimizing Approaches for Lending Agencies, MS Thesis, the Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A. (1965). “Fuzzy Sets.”Information and Control, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 338–353.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H.J. (1987).Fuzzy Sets, Decision-making, and Expert System, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, S.H., Park, HK. Categorical relationship approach as an alternative risk analysis for predicting cost contingency. KSCE J Civ Eng 8, 173–180 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829117

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829117

Keywords

Navigation