Skip to main content
Log in

Response factors for bridges subjected to uniform and multiple support excitations

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

The performance of a typical four span continuous reinforced concrete bridge subjected to uniform and multiple seismic excitations at the supports is investigated in both the time and frequency domains. In the time domain analysis, a linear modal superposition approach is used to compute the peak response values. In the frequency domain analysis, a stochastically based linear random vibration theory is used to determine the root mean square response values where the cross correlation effects from the modal and the support excitations on the seismic response of the bridge model are included. The spatial variability of seismic ground motion may have a significant effect on the dynamic response of bridges. This study shows that the frequency domain analysis is preferred for the design purpose because of the computational advantage and the generality of the results. A practical range of peak factors that may be used with the stochastic analysis for computing the peak responses for typical continuous reinforced concrete bridges is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdel-Ghaffaar, A.M. and Rubin, L.I. (1982). “Suspension Bridge Response to Multiple Support Excitations.”Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 108, No. EM2, 419–435.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abdel-Ghaffaar, A.M. and Rubin, L.I. (1984). “Torsional Earthquake Response of Suspension Bridges.”Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 110, No. 10, 1467–1484.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1997). “Seismic Design Criteria for Bridges and other Highway Structures: Current and Future.”ATC-18, Redwood City. Calif.

  4. Clough, R. W. and Penzien, J. (1993).Dynamics of Structures, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Der Kiureghian, A. and Neuenhofer, A. (1992). “Response Spectrum Method for Multi-Support Seismic Excitations.”Earthquake Engrg. and Struc. Dynamics, Vol. 21, No. 8, 713–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Floren, A. and J. Mohammadi (2001). “Performance-Based Design Approach in Seismic Analysis of Bridges.”Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 6, No. 1, 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harichandran, R.S. and Wang, W. (1990). “Response of Indeterminate Two-Span Beam to Spatially Varying Seismic Excitation.”Earthquake Engrg. and Struc. Dynamics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heredia-Zavoni, E. and Vanmarcke, E. (1994). “Seismic Random-Vibration Analysis of Multisupport Structural Systems,”Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 120, No. 5, 1107–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leger, P., Ide, I.M. and Paultre, P. (1990). “Multiple Support Seismic Analysis of Large Structure,”Computers and Structures, Vol. 36, No. 6, 1153–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perotti, F. (1990). “Structural Response to Non Stationary Multiple Support Random Excitations.”Earthquake Engrg. and Struc. Dynamics, Vol. 19, No. 4, 513–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saiidi, M. S., Maragakis, E. M., Isakovic, T. and Randall, M. (1997). “Performance-based Design of Seismic Restrainers for Simply-Supported Bridges” inSeismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, P. Fajfar and H. Krawindler, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tan, D. (1994). “Discrete Analysis Method for Random Vibration of Structures Subjected to Temporarily and Spatially Correlated Excitations.”Computers and Structures, Vol. 50, No. 5, 619–627.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) (1993). “Seismic Design of Highway Bridges.”FHWA HI-93-040, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yamamura, N. and Tanaka, H. (1990). “Response Analysis of Flexible MDF Systems for Multi-Support Seismic Excitations.”Earthquake Engrg. and Struc. Dynamics, Vol. 19, No. 3, 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zerva, A. (1990). “Response of Multi-Span Beams to Spatially Incoherent Seismic Ground Motions.”Earthquake Engrg. and Struc. Dynamics, Vol. 19, No. 6, 819–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chongyul Yoon.

Additional information

The manuscript for this paper was submitted for review on February 15, 2001.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoon, C., Nazmy, A. Response factors for bridges subjected to uniform and multiple support excitations. KSCE J Civ Eng 5, 131–139 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829069

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829069

Keywords

Navigation