Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study on measured vs. Predicted pavement responses from falling weight deflectometer (FWD) measurements

  • Highway Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Falling weight deflectometer (FWD) drops were applied on the entire 24 test sections, and the resulting surface deflections were measured simultaneously using FWD geophones. The MODULUS 4.0 backcalculation program developed by the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) was used to backcalculate the asphalt concrete layer moduli values of each test section. then the backcalculated moduli values were entered into a forward calculation program, WES-5, with known pavement layer thicknesses, assumed Poisson's ratio, and the magnitude and geometry of FWD loading to calculate the surface and depth deflections. The surface and depth deflections were used to calculate the average vertical strains of different layers at the centerline of loading. In the validation process, the comparisons between the measured and predicted pavement responses were made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hoffman, M.S. and Thompson, M.R. (1982). “A comparative study of selected nondestructive testing Devices.” TRR 852, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosla, N.P. (1991).An evaluation of pavement instrumentation technology, Final Report, Research Project No. FHWA-EP-621-NC-01, Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University.

  • Khosla, N.P., Kim, Y.R., Satish, S., and Kim, N. (1992).A comparative study of performance of different designs for flexible pavements, Interim Report, Research Project No. 23241-87-1, Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University.

  • Kim, N. (1994).Development of performance prediction models for asphalt concrete layers, Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University.

  • Ong, C.L., Newcomb, D.E., and Siddharthan, R. (1992).Comparison of dynamic and static backcalculation modulus for three layer pavements, Published in TRR, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubstad, R.N., Khosla, N.P., and Wynn, W.W. (1989). “Construction of fully instrumented test pavements in north Carolina.” CRREL Symposium,Proc. on State of the Art of Pavement Response Monitoring Systems for Roads and Airfields, West Lebanon, N.H.

  • Tholen, O., Sharma, J., and Terrel, R.L. (1985).Comparison of falling weight deflectometer with other deflection testing devices. TRR 1007, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullidtz, P. (1987).Pavement Analysis. Elsvier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cauwelaert, F.J., Alexander, D.R., White, T.D., and Barker, W.R. (1989).Multilayer elastic program for backcalculating layer moduli in pavement evaluation. in nondestructive testing of pavements and backcalculation of moduli, Special Technical Publication 1026, American Society for Testing and Materials.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nakseok Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, N., Im, SB. A comparative study on measured vs. Predicted pavement responses from falling weight deflectometer (FWD) measurements. KSCE J Civ Eng 9, 91–96 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829063

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829063

Keywords

Navigation