Fair bets and profitability in college football gambling
Efficient markets in college football are tested over a 25-year period, 1976–2000. the market in general is found to be efficient, but betting on underdogs of more than 28 points violates a fair bet. The strategy of betting home underdogs reveals stronger results. Home underdogs of more than seven points are found to reject the null hypotheses of a fair bet over the last 10 years of the sample, 1991–2000. Home underdogs of more than 28 points are found to reject the null of no profitability during the same time frame.
- Feist, J. Various years.Jim Feist's Professional Football Workbook. National Sports Services Publishing.Google Scholar
- Golic, J., and M. Tomarkin. 1991. “The Degree of Inefficiency in the Football Betting Markets.”Journal of Financial Economics 30: 321–330.Google Scholar
- Tryfos, P., S. Casey, S. Cook, G. Leger, and B. Plylypiak. 1984. “The Profitability of Wagering on NFL Games.”Management Science 30: 123–132.Google Scholar