Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between four methods for data fusion of ETM+ multispectral and pan images

  • Published:
Geo-spatial Information Science

Abstract

Four data fusion methods, principle component transform (PCT), brovey transform (BT), smoothing filter-based intensity modulation (SFIM), and hue, saturation, intensity (HSI), are used to merge Landsat—7 ETM+ multispectral bands with ETM+ panchromatic band. Each of them improves the spatial resolution effectively but distorts the original spectral signatures to some extent. SFIM model can produce optimal fusion data with respect to preservation of spectral integrity. However, it results the most blurred and noisy image if the coregistration between the multispectral and pan images is not accurate enough. The spectral integrity for all methods is preserved better if the original multispectral images are within the spectral range of ETM+ pan image.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Genderen J L, Pohl C (1994) Image fusion: issues, techniques and applications. EARSeL Workshop of Intelligent Image Fusion, Strasbourg.

  2. Carper W J, Lillesand T M, Kiefer R W (1990) The use of intensity-hue-saturation transform for merging SPOT panchromatic and multispectral image data.Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56(4): 459–467

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu J G (2000) Evaluation of landsat-7 ETM+ panchromatic band for image fusion with multispectral bands.Natural Resource Research, 9(4): 269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jr Chavez P S, Sides S C, Anderson J A (1991) Comparison of three different methods to merge metiresolution and multispectral data: Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic.Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57(3): 265–303

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jensen J R (1996) Introductory digital image processing. Prentice Hall: A Remote Sensing Perspective.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hydan R, Dalke G W, Henkel J, et al. (1982) Applications of the IHS color transform to the processing of multi-sensor data and image enhancement. International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Arid and Semi-arid Lands, Cairo.

  7. Gillespie A R, Kahle A B, Walker R E (1987) Color enhancement of highly correlated images-II. channel ratio and chromaticity transform techniques.Remote Sensing of Environment, 22(3): 343–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schistad-Solberg A H, Jain A K, Taxt T (1994) Multi-source classification of remote sensed data fusion of landsat TM and SAR images.IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32(4): 768–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Behnia, P. Comparison between four methods for data fusion of ETM+ multispectral and pan images. Geo-spat. Inf. Sci. 8, 98–103 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02826847

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02826847

Key words

CLC Number

Navigation