Skip to main content
Log in

Need for protection against Rubella in India

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reports from different parts of India highlight the existence of Rubella leading to fetal malformations and wastage. However, the need for routine immunization to control rubella has not been duly recognized. In the present study the prevalence of rubella was determined in different age groups of the population by estimating IgG antibodies to rubella virus using ELISA kit obtained from Diamedix. Two hundred and seventy four pairs of maternal blood samples were collected. Samples were also obtained from one hundred and thirty nine children aged 1–15 years and assayed for rubella antibodies. The sample was read as positive if the Elisa unit/ml was 15 EU/ml. The results showed that 94.9% of mothers and 94.1% of cord blood samples showed seropositivity. Children between 1 and 5 years showed the lowest seropositivity of 69.2% which gradually increased to reach near 95% levels by 15 years. These observations indicate the prevalence of rubeila in children and thus suggest the need to protect susceptible women of reproductive age group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sain S, Sharma D, Sabharwal U, Chaudhary U. Rare case of rubella infection-case report of a new born.J Obs Gynecol India 1987; 37: 610–615.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tripathi R, Mehra P, Mathur A et al. Role or rubella virus in cases of abortions.J Obs Gynecol India 1980; 30: 771–775.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Manjunath N, Balaya S. Serological study on congenital rubella in Delhi.Indian J Med Res 1984; 79: 716–721.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaturvedi VC, Tripathi BN, Mathur A et al. Role of rubella in congenital malformation.J Hyg (Camb) 1976; 76: 33–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mathur A, Chaturvedi UC, Mehrotra RML. Serological study for the prevalence of rubella at Lucknow.Indian J Med Res 1974; 62: 307–312.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chakraborty MS, Mukherjee MK, Sarkar JK. rubella antibody profile in women of child bearing age in Cal- cutta area.Indian J Med Res 1973; 61: 340–343.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pal SR, Chitkara NL, Broor S et al. Serological investigation of rubella virus infection in and around Chandigarh—A preliminary communication.Indian J Med Res 1974; 62: 240–245.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Seth P, Balaya S, Mohaptra LN. Sero-epidemiological study of rubella infection in female subjects of Delhi and its surrounding villages.Indian J Med Res 1971; 59: 190–194.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chakraborty MS, Das BC, Gupta B, Sarkar JK. rubella as an aetiological factor for congenital malformation in Calcutta. A serological study.Indian J Med Res 1975; 63: 1438–1445.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mathur A, Tripathi R, Chaturvedi UC, Mehra P. Congenital rubella following inapparent rubella infection.Indian J Med Res 1982; 75: 469–473.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhaskaram, P., Ramalakshmi, B.A., Raju, L.A.R. et al. Need for protection against Rubella in India. Indian J Pediatr 58, 811–814 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02825439

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02825439

Key words

Navigation