KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 127–132 | Cite as

Numerical analysis of free flow past a sluice gate

Water Engineering

Abstract

Sluice gates are widely used for flow control in open channels. This study shows that numerical tools using the Reynolds averaging Navier-Stokes equations are sufficiently advanced to calculate the contraction and the discharge coefficients, and the pressure distribution for free flow past a sluice gate. The trend of the existing inviscid theoretical contraction coefficient is quitedifferent from existing experiments. As the gate opening rate increases, the contraction coefficient for the present study gradually decreases if the gate opening rate is less than 0.4 and increases when the gate opening rate is larger than 0.4, exhibiting a tendency similar to existing experimental data. This is because energy losses by friction and water surface oscillations increase as the approach velocity from the gate increases as the gate opening rate is larger than 0.4. The discharge coefficients and the pressure distributions from the present analysis correspond closely to the existing experimental data. In this study, by performing a numerical analysis that does not use the assumptions adopted in the existing potential flow theory, the contraction coefficient, the discharge coefficient, and the pressure distributions were thoroughly analyzed. This study shows that existing numerical models using RANS are a useful tool in the design of hydraulic structures.

Keywords

contraction coefficient discharge coefficient RANS sluice gate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benjamin, T. B. (1956). “On the flow in channels when rigid obstacles are placed in the stream.”J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 1, pp. 227–248.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng, A. H. D., Liggett, J. A., and Liu, P. (1981). “Boundary calculations of sluice and spillway flows.”J. Hydraulics Div., ASCE, Vol. 107, No. 10, pp. 1163–1178.Google Scholar
  3. Chung, Y. C. (1972). “Solution of flow under sluice gates.”J. Engineering Mech. Div., ASCE, Vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 121–140.Google Scholar
  4. Fangmeier, D. and Strelkoff, T. S. (1968). “Solution for gravity flow under sluice gates.”J. Engineering Mech. Div., ASCE, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 153–176.Google Scholar
  5. Flow Science, Inc. (2002).FLOW-3D (theory manual), Los Alamos, NM.Google Scholar
  6. Hager, W. H. (1999).Wastewater hydraulics, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  7. Henderson, F. M. (1966).Open channel flow, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Isaacs, L. T. (1977). “Numerical solution for flow under sluice gates.”J. Hydraulics Div., ASCE, Vol. 103, No. 5, pp. 473–481.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Larock, B. E. (1969). “Gravity affected flows from planar sluice gates,”J. Hydraulics Div., ASCE, Vol. 95, No. 4, pp. 851–864.Google Scholar
  10. Lin, C. H., Yen, J. F., and Tsai, C. T. (2002). “Influence of sluice gate contraction coefficient on distinguishing condition.”J. Irrigation and Drainage Eng., ASCE, Vol. 128, No. 4, pp. 249–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Masliyah, J. H., Nandakumar, K., Hemphill, F., and Fung, L. (1985). “Body fitted coordinates for flow under sluice gates.”J. Hydraulic Eng., ASCE, Vol. 111, No. 6, pp. 922–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Montes, J. S. (1997). “Irrotational flow and real fluid effects under planar sluice gates.”J. Hydraulic Eng., ASCE, Vol. 123, No. 3, pp. 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rajaratnam, N. and Humphries, J. A. (1982). “Free flow upstream of vertical sluice gates.”J. Hydraulic Research, IAHR, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rajaratnam, N. and Subramanya, K. (1967). “Flow equation for the sluice gate.”J. Irrigation and Drainage Eng., ASCE, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 167–186.Google Scholar
  15. Roth, A. and Hager, W. H. (1999). “Underflow of standard sluice gate.”Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 27, pp. 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Savage, B. M. and Johnson, M. C. (2001). “Flow over ogee spillway: Physical and numerical model case study.”J. Hydraulic Eng., ASCE, Vol. 127, No. 8, pp. 640–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vanden-Broeck, J. M. (1997). “Numerical calculations of the free surface flow under a sluice gate.”J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 330, pp. 339–347.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yakhot, V. and Orszag, S. A. (1986). “Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory.”J. Scientific Computing, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1–51.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Yakhot, V. and Smith, L. M. (1992). “The renormalization group, the ε-expansion and derivation of turbulence model.”J. Scientific Computing, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 35–61.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KSCE and Springer jointly 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Construction Engrg.Mokpo National Univ.ChonnamKor

Personalised recommendations