Abstract
We compared nekton densities over a range of measured flooding conditions and locations withinPhragmites australis andSpartina alterniflora (salt marsh cordgrass) at the Charles Wheeler Salt Marsh, located on the lower Housatonic River estuary in southwestern Connecticut. Nekton were sampled on nine spring high tide events from May to October 2000 using bottomless lift nets positioned between 0–5 and 10–20 m from the creek edge. Flooding depth, duration, and frequency were measured from each vegetation type during each sampling month. Benthic macroinvertebrate density was also measured within each vegetation type in May, July, and September. Frequency of flooding was 52% lower and flooding depth and duration were also significantly reduced inP. australis relative toS. alterniflora. A total of 4,197 individuals representing 7 species, mostlyPalaemonetes pugio (dagger-blade grass shrimp) andFundulus heteroclitus (common mummichog), were captured.P. pugio densities were significantly greater inS. alterniflora as were benthic macroinvertebrate density and taxa richness during May, but not during June or October. Total fish density was not significantly different betweenP. australis andS. alterniflora and was independent of location on the marsh. Significantly more juvenileF. heteroclitus were collected withinS. alterniflora relative toP. australis in June and July, suggesting that recruitment of this species may be lower inP. australis habitat. Fish density generally did not vary predictably across the range of flooding depth and duration; there was a positive relationship between flooding depth and fish density inS. alterniflora. The measured reduction in flooding frequency (52%) withinP. australis at the Housatonic site would result in an average total monthly fish use, expressed as density, of 447 ind m−2 forP. australis and 947 ind m−2 forS. alterniflora. WhenP. australis expansion results in reduction of flooding frequency and duration, nekton community composition can change, access to the marsh surface is reduced twofold, and nursery habitat function may be impaired.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Able, K. W. andS. M. Hagan. 2000. Effects of common reed (Phragmites australis) invasion on marsh surface macrofauna: Response of fishes and decapod crustaceans.Estuaries 23:633–646.
Able, K. W., C. W. Talbot, andJ. K. Shishler. 1983. The spotfin killifish (Fundulus luciae), is abundant in New Jersey salt marshes.Bulletin of the New Jersey Academy of Science 28:7–10.
Angradi, T. R., S. M. Hagan, andK. W. Able. 2001. Vegetation marsh:Phragmites vs.Spartina.Wetlands 21:75–92.
Bart, D. J. andJ. M. Hartman. 2000. Environmental determinants ofPhragmites australis expansion in a New Jersey salt marsh: An experimental approach.Oikos 89:59–69.
Benoit, L. K. andR. A. Askins. 1999. Impact of the spread ofPhragmites on the distribution of birds in Connecticut tidal marshes.Wetlands 19:194–208.
Chambers, R. M., L. A. Meyerson, andK. Saltonstall. 1999. Expansion ofPhragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America.Aquatic Botany 64:261–273.
Chambers, R. M., D. T. Osgood, andN. Kalapasev. 2002. Hydrologic and chemical controls ofPhragmites distribution on the Lower Housatonic River estuary.Marine Ecology Progress Series 239:83–91.
Fell, P. E., S. P. Weissbach, D. A. Jones, M. A. Fallon J. A. Zeppieri, E. K. Faison, K. A. Lennon, K. J. Newberry, andL. K. Reddington. 1998. Does invasion of oligohaline tidal marshes by reed grass,Phragmites australis, affect the availability of prey resources for the mummichog,Fundulus heteroclitus? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 222:59–77.
Hanson, S., D. T. Osgood, andD. J. Yozzo. 2002. Nekton use of aPhragmites australis marsh on the Hudson River, New York.Wetlands 22:326–337.
Joyce, A. A. andS. B. Weisberg. 1986. The effects of predation by the mummichog.Fundulus heteroclitus (L.) on the abundance and distribution of the salt marsh snail,Melampus bidentatus (Say).Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 100:295–306.
Kneib, R. T. 1984. Patterns in the utilization of the intertidal salt marsh by larvae and juveniles ofFundulus heteroclitus (Linnaeus) andFundulus luciae (Baird).Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 83:41–51.
Kneib, R. T. 1985. Predation and disturbance by grass shrimp,Palaemonetes pugio Holthuis, in soft-substratum benthic invertebrate assemblages.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 93:91–102.
Kneib, R. T. 1997a. The role of tidal marshes in the ecology of estuarine nekton.Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 35:163–220.
Kneib, R. T. 1997b. Early life stages of resident, nekton in intertidal marshes.Estuaries 20:214–230.
Kneib, R. T. andA. E. Stiven. 1982. Benthic invertebrate responses to size and density manipulations of the common mummichog,Fundulus heteroditus, in an intertidal marsh.Ecology 63:1518–1532.
Kneib, R. T. andS. L. Wagner. 1994. Nekton use of vegetated marsh habitats at different stages of tidal inundation.Marine Ecology Progress Series 94:227–238.
Marks, M., B. Lapin, andJ. Randall. 1994.Phragmites australis (P. communis): Threats, management, and monitoring.Natural Areas Journal 14:285–294.
Meyer, D. L., J. M. Johnson, andJ. W. Gill. 2001. Comparison of nekton use ofPhragmites australis andS. alterniflora marshes in the Chesapeake Bay, USA.Marine Ecology Progress Series 209:71–84.
Minello, T. J. andJ. W. Webb, Jr. 1997. Use of natural and created SA salt marshes by fisheries species and other aquatic fauna in Galveston Bay, Texas (USA).Marine Ecology Progress Series 151:165–179.
Minello, T. J., R. J. Zimmerman, andR. Medina. 1994. The importance of edge for natant macrofauna in a created salt marsh.Wetlands 14:184–198.
Orson, R. A., R. S. Warren, andW. A. Niering. 1987. Development of a New England river valley tidal marsh.Estuaries 10:20–27.
Osgood, D. T. 2000. Subsurface hydrology and nutrient export from barrier island marshes at different tidal ranges.Wetlands Ecology and Management 8:133–146.
Raposa, K. B. andC. T. Roman. 2001. Seasonal habitat-use patterns of nekton in tide-restricted and unrestricted New England salt marsh.Wetlands 21:451–461.
Rilling, G. C., P. E. Fell, andR. S. Warren. 1998. Fish use of brackish tidal wetlands on the lower Connecticut River: A comparison of aPhragmites australis-dominated vs. a restored high marsh. Technical report to the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Long Island Sound Programs. Hartford, Connecticut.
Robert, L. L. andJ. F. Matta. 1984. Aquatic macroinvertebrates in an irregularly flooded salt marsh: Diversity and seasonal variation.Environmental Entomology 13:1097–1104.
Rooth, J. E. andJ. C. Stevenson 2000. Sediment deposition patterns inPhragmites australis communities: Implications for coastal areas threatened by rising sea-level.Wetlands Ecology and Management 8:173–183.
Rozas, L. P. 1992. Bottomless lift net for quantitatively sampling nekton on intertidal marshes.Marine Ecology Progress Series 89: 282–292.
Rozas, L. P., C. C. McIvor, andW. E. Odum. 1988. Intertidal rivulets and creekbanks: Corridors between tidal creeks and marshes.Marine Ecology Progress Series 47:303–307.
Rozas, L. P. andW. E. Odum. 1988. Occupation of submerged aquatic vegetation by fishes: Testing the roles of food and refuge.Oecologia 77:101–106.
Rozas, L. P. andD. J. Reed. 1993. Nekton use of marsh-surface habitats in Louisiana (USA) deltaic salt marshes undergoing submergence.Marine Ecology Progress Series 96:147–157.
Taylor, M. H., L. DiMichele, andG. J. Leach. 1977. Egg stranding in the life cycle of the mummichog.Fundulus heteroclitus, Copeia 1977:397–399.
Taylor, M. H., G. J. Leach, L. DiMichele, W. H. Levitan, andW. F. Jacob. 1979. Lunar spawning cycle in the mummichog,Fundulus heteroclitus (Pisces: Cyprinodontidae).Copeia 1979:291–297.
Vince, S., I. Valiela, andN. Backus. 1976. Predation by the salt marsh killifishFundulus heteroclitus (L.) in relation to prey size and habitat structure: Consequences for prey distribution and abundance.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 23:255–266.
Wainwright, S. C., M. P. Weinstein, K. W. Able, andC. A. Currin. 2000. Relative importance of benthic microalgae, phytoplankton and the detritus of smooth cordgrass (Spartina) and the common reed (Phragmites) to brackish marsh food webs.Marine Ecology Progress Series 200:77–91.
Warren, R. S., P. E. Fell, J. L. Grimsby, E. L. Buck, G. C. Rilling, andR. A. Fertik. 2001. Rates, patterns and impacts ofPhragmites australis expansion and effects of experimentalPhragmites control on vegetation, macroinvertebrates, and fish within tidelands of the Lower Connecticut River.Estuaries 24:90–107.
Weinstein, M. P. andJ. H. Baletto. 1999. Does the common reed,Phragmites australis, affect essential fish habitat?Estuaries 22:793–802.
Whitworth, W. R. 1996. Freshwater fishes of Connecticut. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Bulletin 114. Hartford, Connecticut.
Windham, L. andR. G. Lathrop. 1999. Effects ofPhragmites australis (common reed) invasion on aboveground biomass and soil properties in brackish tidal marsh of the Mullica River, New Jersey,Estuaries 22:927–935.
Wingrond, H. G. andE. Kiviat. 1997. Invasion ofPhragmites australis in the tidal marshes of the Hudson River, p. VI: 1–29.In W. C. Nieder and J. R. Waldman (eds.), Final Reports of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Program, 1996. Hudson River Foundation, New York
Yozzo, D. J., A. Mannino, andD. E. Smith. 1994. Mid-summer abundance of resident sub-adult marsh nekton at the Virginia Coast Reserve.Virginia Journal of Science 45:22–30.
Yozzo, D. J. andD. E. Smith. 1998. Composition and abundance of resident marsh-surface nekton: Comparison between tidal freshwater and salt marshes in Virginia, USA.Hydrobiologia 362:9–19.
Source of Unpublished Materials
Orson Environmental Consulting., personal communication. P. O. Box 921, Branford, Connecticut 06405-0921
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Osgood, D.T., Yozzo, D.J., Chambers, R.M. et al. Tidal hydrology and habitat utilization by resident nekton inPragmites and Non-Phragmites Marshes. Estuaries 26, 522–533 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823728
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823728