Skip to main content
Log in

Observations on the multiply charged particles of the cosmic radiation

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)

Summary

A nuclear emulsion technique has been used to measure the fluxes of the α-particles of the primary cosmic radiation at three different geographical positions. Two of these determinations were made on the same geomagnetic latitude, one over America, which has been previously reported (1), and the other over England. The two flux values found were unexpectedly significantly different, and this difference could be entirely attributed to the absence over England of those α-particles with energies of less than about 0.65 GeV per nucleon. Measurements on the protons and heavy primary particles detected in those two stacks of emulsions also indicated that the cut-off energy over England at the time of the exposure was between 0.60 and 0.70 GeV per nucleon, instead of the 0.33 GeV per nucleon calculated from the known geomagnetic latitude. Similarly, the data from the American stack suggest that when this was exposed the cut-off energy was less than 0.15 GeV per nucleon. An analysis has been made of the various experimental flux values obtained at different points on the earth’s surface, and it is concluded that the cut-off energies should be calculated, not from the geomagnetic latitudes, but from latitudes which are from four to six degrees lower over Europe, and three or more degrees higher over America.

Riassunto

Una tecnica basata sull’impiego di emulsioni nucleari è stata usata per misurare il flusso delle particelle a della radiazione cosmica primaria in tre posizioni geografiche differenti. Due di tali determinazioni furono fatte alla stessa latitudine geomagnetica, una in America già precedentemente riferita (1), e l’altra in Inghilterra. I due valori del flusso trovati furono, contrariamente alle aspettative, significativamente differenti e tale differenza potè essere interamente attribuita alla assenza sull’Inghilterra di particelle α con energie inferiori a circa 0.65 GeV per nucleone. Misure sui protoni e sulle particelle primarie pesanti scoperte in questi due pacchi di emulsioni indicarono anche che l’energia di taglio sull’Inghilterra era all’epoca dell’esposizione tra 0. 60 e 0.70 GeV per nucleone invece dei 0.33 GeV per nucleone calcolati dalla latitudine geomagnetica nota. Similmente, i dati del pacco americano indicano che, all’epoca in cui fu esposto, l’energia di taglio era inferiore a 0.15 GeV per nucleone. Si è eseguita un’analisi dei vari valori sperimentali del flusso ottenuti in diversi luoghi della superficie terrestre e si conclude che le energie di taglio si debbono calcolare non in base alla latitudine geomagnetica, bensi a latitudini di quattro gradi inferiori sull’Europa e di tre o più gradi superiori in America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. J. Waddington:Phil. Mag.,1, 105 (1956).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. C. J. Waddington:Phil. Mag.,1, 105 (1956).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. F. Kaplon, B. Peters, H. L. Reynolds andD. M. Ritson:Phys. Rev.,85, 295 (1952).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. H. Fowler andD. H. Perkins:Phil. Mag.,46, 587 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. E. Daniel andD. H. Perkins:Proc. Boy. Soc., A221, 351 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. P. H. Fowler:Phil. Mag.,41, 169 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. L. Bradt andB. Peters:Phys. Rev:,77, 54 (1950).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. F. Kaplon, J. H. Noon andG. W. Racette:Phys. Rev.,95, 1408 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Gottstein:Phil. May.,45, 347 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. P. Ney andD. M. Thon:Phys. Rev.,81, 1068 (1951).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. L. R. Davis, H. M. Caulk andC. Y. Johnson:Phys. Rev.,91, 431 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Biswas, B. Peters andRama:Proc. Ind. Acad.,41, 154 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. D. Dainton, P. H. Fowler andD. W. Kent:Phil. Mag.,43, 729 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Rossi:Suppl. Nuovo Cimento,2, 275 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Linsley:Phys. Rev.,93, 899 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Goldfaeb, H. L. Bradt andB. Peters:Phys. Rev.,77, 751 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. J. Perlow, L. R. Davis, C. W. Kissinger andJ. D. Shipman {jrJr.}:Phys. Rev.,88, 321 (1952).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. N. Horwitz:Phys. Rev.,98, 165 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Bohl:Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota (1954).

  20. B. Peters:Progress in Cosmic Bay Physics, vol. I (1952).

  21. M. A. Pomerantz:Journ. Frank. Inst.,258, 443 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. W. McClure:Phys. Rev.,96, 1391 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Fay:Zeits. f. Naturf.,10a, 572 (1955).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. E. F. Hourd, J. R. Fleming andJ. J. Lord:Phys. Rev.,95, 647 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Lal, Yash Pal, M. F. Kaplon andB. Peters:Phys. Rev.,86, 569 (1952).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. E. E. Danielson:Ph. D. Thesis, university of Minnesota (1954).

  27. J. A. Simpson, D. C. Rose, K. B. Fenton andJ. Katzman (to be published) (1955).

  28. F. A. Brisbout, C. Dahanayake, A. Engler, P. H. Fowler andP. B. Jones (to be published).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waddington, C.J. Observations on the multiply charged particles of the cosmic radiation. Nuovo Cim 3, 930–955 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823494

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823494

Navigation