Skip to main content
Log in

Organogenic regeneration of soybean from hypocotyl explants

  • Developmenal Biology/Morphogenesis
  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Thirteen soybean genotypes representing maturity groups IV−VI were compared for organogenic responses on three media cultured under two lighting conditions with hypocotyl sections excised from 7-d-old seedlings. All soybean lines responsed by producing adventitious shoots on the acropetal end of the hypocotyl explants, confirming genotype-independence of shoot initiation. Media containing 6-benzyladenine (BA; 5.0–10 μM) induced the greatest numbers of shoots. Histological studies confirmed the adventitious nature of arising shoots by indicative formation of meristematic zones and shoot primordia from parenchymatous tissues of central pith and plumular trace regions of the hypocotyl. Incompletely excised cotyledonary buds also contributed to shoot initiation. Degrees of responses were media-dependent and varied with regard to genotype. Centennial, Epps, and Lyon gave the greatest individual responses. Between cultivars (across all treatments), the regeneration potential (percentage of explants producing meristem-like structures or shoot primordia) 4 wk after initiation ranged from 47 to 75%. Four wk later, regenerative ability (number of shoots produced per responding explant) and regeneration efficiency (number of shoots produced per explant plated) yielded 1.4–7.1 and 1.0–5.0 shoots, respectively. The optimized protocol included initiation on a medium containing 5.0 μM BA for 4 wk, then transfer onto a shoot elongation medium (0.36 μM BA) for 4 wk. For 11 genotypes tested, 66–100% of excised shoots produced roots after 4 wk on media containing 12.5–29.2 μM indole-3-butyric acid. Of 109 regenerants transplanted to soil, 94% survived and no sterility has been observed on those mature enough to flower.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amberger, L. A.; Palmer, R. G.; Shoemaker, R. C. Analysis of culture-induced variation in soybean. Crop Sci. 32:1103–1108; 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bailey, M. A.; Boerma, H. R.; Parrott, W. A. Genotype-specific optimization of plant regeneration from somatic embryos of soybean. Plant Sci. 93:117–120; 1993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barwale, U. B.; Kerns, H. R.; Widholm, J. M. Plant regeneration from callus cultures of several soybean genotypes via embryogenesis and organogenesis. Planta 167:473–481; 1986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barwale, U. B.; Widholm, J. M. Somaclonal variation in plants regenerated from cultures of soybean. Plant Cell Rep. 6:365–368; 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, H. H.; Chan, M. T.Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is promoted by the inclusion of potato suspension culture. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. (Taipei) 32:171–178; 1991.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Christou, P.; McCabe, D. E.; Swain, W. F., et al. Legume transformation. In: Verma, D. P. S., ed. Control of plant gene expression. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc.; 1992:547–564.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Freytag, A. H.; Rao-Arelli, A. P.; Anand, S. C., et al. Somaclonal variation in soybean plants regenerated from tissue culture. Plant Cell Rep. 8:199–202; 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gamborg, O. L.; Miller, R. A.; Ojima, R. A. Nutrient requirements of suspension culture of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50:151–158; 1968.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Graybosch, R. A.; Edge, M. E.; Delannay, X. Somaclonal variation in soybean plants regenerated from the cotyledonary node tissue culture system. Crop Sci. 27:803–806; 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hawbaker, M. S.; Fehr, W. R.; Mansur, L. M., et al. Genetic variation for quantitative traits in soybean lines derived from tissue culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:49–53; 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hinchee, M. A.; Conner-Ward, D. V.; Newell, C. A., et al. Production of transgenic soybean plants usingAgrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer. Bio/Technology 6:915–922; 1988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kameya, T.; Widholm, J. Plant regeneration from hypocotyl sections ofGlycine species. Plant Sci. Lett. 21:289–294; 1981.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kimball, S. L.; Bingham, E. T. A. Adventitious bud development of soybean hypocotyl sections in culture. Crop Sci. 13:758–760; 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lersten, N. R.; Carlson, J. B. Vegetative morphology. In: Wilcox, J. R., ed. Soybeans: improvement, production, and uses. Madison, WI: ASA, Inc., CSSA, Inc., SSSA, Inc.; 1987:49–79.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mante, S.; Scorza, R.; Cordts, J. A simple, rapid protocol for adventitious shoot development from mature cotyledons ofGlycine max cv Bragg. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 25P:385–388; 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473–497; 1962.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pandey, P.; Bansal, Y. K. Plant regeneration from leaf and hypocotyl explants ofGlycine wightii (W. and A.) Verdc. varlongicauda. Jpn. J. Breed. 42:1–5; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parrott, W. A.; Williams, E. G.; Hildebrand, D. F., et al. Effect of genotype on somatic embryogenesis from immature cotyledons of soybean. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 16:15–21; 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT user's Guide, version 6, 4th ed. SAS Inst. Cary, NC; 1989.

  20. Stephens, P. A.; Nickell, C. D.; Widholm, J. M. Agronomic evaluation of tissue-culture-derived soybean plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82:633–635; 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Widholm, J. M.; Rick, S. Shoot regeneration fromGlycine canescens tissue culture. Plant Cell Rep. 2:19–20; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wright, M. S.; Koehler, S. M.; Hinchee, M. A., et al. Plant regeneration by organogenesis inGlycine max. Plant Cell Rep. 5:150–154; 1986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wright, M. S.; Ward, D. V.; Hinchee, M. A., et al. Regeneration of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) from primary leaf tissue. Plant Cell Rep. 6:83–89; 1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wright, M. S.; Williams, M. H.; Pierson, P. E., et al. Initiation and propagation ofGlycine max L. Merr.: plants from tissue-cultured epicotyls. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 8:83–90; 1987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dan, Y., Reichert, N.A. Organogenic regeneration of soybean from hypocotyl explants. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 34, 14–21 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823117

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823117

Key words

Navigation