Summary
Some theoretical points of a previous paper on the same subject are further developed. In particular, it is shown that 1) the elementary treatments of the Aharonov-Bohm effect are vitiated by a false conception of the electron wave phase; 2) the Aharonov-Bohm effect is a consequence of an improper choice of the initial condition, or—alternatively—of the choice of an improper Green's propagator for the initial wave function. Then, the most significant experiments on the Aharonov-Bohm effect are discussed; it is shown that they are not probative, and a simple explanation is proposed.
Riassunto
Si rendono espliciti taluni aspetti teorici di un'argomentazione sviluppata in un precedente lavoro sul medesimo problema. Si discutono poi i più significativi esperimenti sull'effetto Aharonov-Bohm, si dimostra che essi non sono probanti e se ne propone una semplice interpretazione.
Similar content being viewed by others
Footnotes
P. Bocchieri andA. Loinger:Nuovo Cimento,47 A, 475 (1978).
Cf.,e.g.,R. P. Feynman et al.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics, sect. II-15-12 (Reading, Mass., 1964);J. J. Sakurai:Advanced Quantum Mechanics (Reading, Mass., 1969), p. 16;G. Baym:Lectures on Quantum Mechanics (New York, N. Y., 1969), p. 77. We mention further the short note byT. H. Boyer:Amer. Journ. Phys.,40, 56 (1972), in which some mistakes of the elementary treatments of the AB effect are corrected. In a following paper (Phys. Rev. D,8, 1679 (1973)), this author has tried to explain classically the magnetic AB effect, by investigating the electrodynamical interaction of the electron beam with the current flowing in the solenoid.
Cf.,e.g.,E. J. Konopinski:Amer. Journ. Phys.,46, 499 (1978).
E. Nelson:Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion (Princeton, N. J., 1967), p. 130.
E. Madelung:Zeits. Phys.,40, 322 (1926);L. Jánossy:Zeits. Phys.,169, 79 (1962);G. W. Mackey:The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (New York, N. Y., 1963), p. 96;F. Strocchi andA. S. Wightman:Journ. Math. Phys.,15, 2198 (1974).
M. Kretschmar:Zeits. Phys.,185, 84, 97 (1965).
H. Boersch, H. Hamisch, K. Grohmann andD. Wohlleben:Zeits. Phys.,165, 79 (1961);H. Boersch, H. Hamisch andK. Grohmann:Zeits. Phys.,169, 263 (1962).
G. Möllenstedt andW. Bayh:Phys. Bl.,18, 299 (1962);W. Bayh:Zeits. Phys.,169, 492 (1962);G. Schaal, C. Jönsson andE. F. Krimmel:Optik,24, 529 (1966–67).
H. Boersch, H. Hamisch, D. Wohlleben andK. Grohmann:Zeits. Phys.,159, 397 (1960);H. Boersch, H. Hamisch, K. Grohmann andD. Wohlleben:Zeits. Phys.,167, 72 (1962)).
G. Möllenstedt andH. Düker:Zeits. Phys.,145, 377 (1956).
H. Buchholz:Elektrische und magnetische Potentialfelder (Berlin, etc., 1957), p. 270.
See,e. g.,R. K. Luneburg:Mathematical Theory of Optics (Berkeley, Cal., etc., 1964), p. 373.
W. Ehrenberg andR. E. Siday:Proc. Phys. Soc.,62 B, 8 (1949).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bocchieri, P., Loinger, A. & Siragusa, G. Nonexistence of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.—II. Nuov Cim A 51, 1–17 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02822321
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02822321