Skip to main content
Log in

Nonexistence of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.—II

Discussion of the experiments

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

Summary

Some theoretical points of a previous paper on the same subject are further developed. In particular, it is shown that 1) the elementary treatments of the Aharonov-Bohm effect are vitiated by a false conception of the electron wave phase; 2) the Aharonov-Bohm effect is a consequence of an improper choice of the initial condition, or—alternatively—of the choice of an improper Green's propagator for the initial wave function. Then, the most significant experiments on the Aharonov-Bohm effect are discussed; it is shown that they are not probative, and a simple explanation is proposed.

Riassunto

Si rendono espliciti taluni aspetti teorici di un'argomentazione sviluppata in un precedente lavoro sul medesimo problema. Si discutono poi i più significativi esperimenti sull'effetto Aharonov-Bohm, si dimostra che essi non sono probanti e se ne propone una semplice interpretazione.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Footnotes

  1. P. Bocchieri andA. Loinger:Nuovo Cimento,47 A, 475 (1978).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cf.,e.g.,R. P. Feynman et al.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics, sect. II-15-12 (Reading, Mass., 1964);J. J. Sakurai:Advanced Quantum Mechanics (Reading, Mass., 1969), p. 16;G. Baym:Lectures on Quantum Mechanics (New York, N. Y., 1969), p. 77. We mention further the short note byT. H. Boyer:Amer. Journ. Phys.,40, 56 (1972), in which some mistakes of the elementary treatments of the AB effect are corrected. In a following paper (Phys. Rev. D,8, 1679 (1973)), this author has tried to explain classically the magnetic AB effect, by investigating the electrodynamical interaction of the electron beam with the current flowing in the solenoid.

  3. Cf.,e.g.,E. J. Konopinski:Amer. Journ. Phys.,46, 499 (1978).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Nelson:Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion (Princeton, N. J., 1967), p. 130.

  5. E. Madelung:Zeits. Phys.,40, 322 (1926);L. Jánossy:Zeits. Phys.,169, 79 (1962);G. W. Mackey:The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (New York, N. Y., 1963), p. 96;F. Strocchi andA. S. Wightman:Journ. Math. Phys.,15, 2198 (1974).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Kretschmar:Zeits. Phys.,185, 84, 97 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Boersch, H. Hamisch, K. Grohmann andD. Wohlleben:Zeits. Phys.,165, 79 (1961);H. Boersch, H. Hamisch andK. Grohmann:Zeits. Phys.,169, 263 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Möllenstedt andW. Bayh:Phys. Bl.,18, 299 (1962);W. Bayh:Zeits. Phys.,169, 492 (1962);G. Schaal, C. Jönsson andE. F. Krimmel:Optik,24, 529 (1966–67).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Boersch, H. Hamisch, D. Wohlleben andK. Grohmann:Zeits. Phys.,159, 397 (1960);H. Boersch, H. Hamisch, K. Grohmann andD. Wohlleben:Zeits. Phys.,167, 72 (1962)).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Möllenstedt andH. Düker:Zeits. Phys.,145, 377 (1956).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Buchholz:Elektrische und magnetische Potentialfelder (Berlin, etc., 1957), p. 270.

  12. See,e. g.,R. K. Luneburg:Mathematical Theory of Optics (Berkeley, Cal., etc., 1964), p. 373.

  13. W. Ehrenberg andR. E. Siday:Proc. Phys. Soc.,62 B, 8 (1949).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bocchieri, P., Loinger, A. & Siragusa, G. Nonexistence of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.—II. Nuov Cim A 51, 1–17 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02822321

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02822321

Navigation