Skip to main content
Log in

The fitness of the code: A three-legged cauldron

  • Forum: Names and Nomenelature in Phytosociology
  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica & Phytotaxonomica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Barkman J.J. (1953a): Some proposals for a phytosociological nomenclature. In:Osvald H. &Åberg E. (eds.)Proceedings of the seventh International Botanical Congress, Stockholm July 12–20 1950, Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, pp. 663–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkman J.J. (1953b): Comments on the rules of phytosociological nomenclature proposed by E. Meijer Drees.Vegetatio 4: 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkman J.J., Moravec J. &Rauschert S. (1976): Code of phytosociological nomenclature.Vegetatio 32: 131–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet J. (1933a): Phytosociological nomenclature.Ecology 14: 315–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet J. (1933b):Prodrome des groupements végétaux. 1. Ammophiletaliaet Salicornietaliamédit. Station Internationale Géobotanique Méditerranéenne Alpine, Montpellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet J. (1953): [Zur Nomenclaturfrage].Vegetatio 4: 243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet J. (1964):Pflanzensoziologie. Springer Verlag, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flahault C. &Schröter C. (1910): Rapport sur la nomenclature phytogéographique. In:Wildeman E.D. (ed.),Actes du IIIème Congrès International de Botanique, Bruxelles 1910, De Boeck, Bruxelles, pp. 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinochet M. (1957): Nomenclature phytosociologique. Remarques et recommendations. In:Huitième congrès international de botanique, Paris 1954, Comptes rendus des séances et rapports et communications déposés lors du congrès dans les sections 7 et 8, Pierre André, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemée G. (1953): Observations sur le projet de nomenclature phytosociologique de M. Meijer Drees.Vegetatio 4: 237–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer Drees E. (1953): A tentative design for rules of phytosociological nomenclature.Vegetatio 4: 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L. (1997): Quo vadis Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature?Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 32: 395–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorfer E. (1953): Zur Nomenklaturfrage in der Pflanzensoziologie.Vegetatio 4: 222–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto da Silva A.R. (1953): L’index des groupements végétaux. Proposition pour sa réalisation. In:Osvald H. &Åberg E. (eds.),Proceedings of the seventh International Botanical Congress, Stockholm July 12–20 1950, Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm pp. 666–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theurillat J.-P. &Moravec J. (1990a): Index of new names of syntaxa published in 1987.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 25: 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theurillat J.-P. &Moravec J. (1990b): Index of names of syntaxa typified in 1987.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 25: 101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tüxen R. (ed.) (1971-1986):Bibliographia phytosociologica syntaxonomica. Cramer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Paul Theurillat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Theurillat, JP. The fitness of the code: A three-legged cauldron. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 32, 401–406 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02821946

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02821946

Keywords

Navigation