Skip to main content
Log in

Inoculation of potatoes with microorganisms under field conditions

II. Changes in the Rhizosphere microflora and occurrence of selected infective agents causing diseases of plants and tubers

  • Published:
Folia Microbiologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes in the rhizosphere microflora of potatoes inoculated with isolates ofPseudomonas putida andTrichoderma sp. were studied in selected experiments in the potato- and beet-growing regions. During initial phases of their growth increased numbers of bacteria, a significantly increased occurence of fluorescent pseudomonads but decreased numbers of fungal germs including representatives of the genusFusarium were detected. Later, when the number of pseudomonads in the rhizosphere decreased, an increased occurrence ofRhizoctonia solani was found. In experiments performed in the beet-growing region its occurrence in bacterized potatoes was lower, and varied in the potato-growing region. Bacterization of potatoes also resulted in a lower occurrence of diseases in stored potatoes (potato mould and wet rot). Changes in the microflora of the inoculated potatoes were associated with antagonistic properties of the isolates. Variability of colonization of the roots by pseudomonads can be attributed to changes in soil moisture during plant growth. In the presence ofGaeumannomyces graminis the used isolates ofP. putida stimulated formation of the root system of wheat cultivated in a nutrient medium. Suspensions of microorganisms were more practical as inoculum than the other preparations considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakker A.W., Schippers B.: Microbial cyanide production in the rhizosphere in relation to potato yield reduction andPseudomonas spp. mediated plant growth stimulation.Soil Biol. Biochem.19, 451–457 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burr T.J., Schroth M.N., Suslow T.: Increased potato yields by treatment of seed pieces with specific strains ofPseudomonas fluorescens andP. putida.Phytopathology68, 1377–1383 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook R.J.: Management of the environment for the control of pathogens.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond.B318, 171–182 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon J.W.: Biocontrol of soil-borne plant pathogens with introduced inocula.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond.B318, 249–264 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domsch K.H., Gams W.: Die Bedeutung vorfruchtabhängigen Verschiebungen in der Bodenmikroflora. II. Antagonistische Einflüsse auf pathogene Bodenpilze.Phytopath. Z.63, 156–158 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels F.P., Schippers B.: Reduction of yield depressions in high frequency potato cropping soil after seed tuber treatments with antagonistic fluorescentPseudomonas spp.Phytopath. Z.108, 207–214 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardson B., Alström S., Rämert B.: Plant reactions to inoculation of roots with fungi and bacteria.Phytopath. Z.114, 108–117 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howie W.T., Echandi E.: Rhizobacteria: Influence of cultivation and soil type on plant growth and yield of potato.Soil Biol. Biochem.15, 127–132 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howrie W.J., Cook R.J., Weller D.M.: Effects of soil matric potential and cell motility on wheat root colonization by fluorescent pseudomonads suppressive to take-all.Phytopathology77, 286–292 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson H.: Nature and importance of the rhizosphere, pp. 187–209 in K.F. Baker, W.C. Snyder (Eds.):Ecology of Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens. University of California Press, Berkeley 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper J.W., Leong J., Teintze M., Schroth M.N.:Pseudomonas siderophores: A mechanism explaining disease-suppressive soils.Curr. Microbiol.4, 317–320 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper J.W., Schroth M.N.: Development of a powder formulation of rhizobacteria for inoculation of potato seed pieces.Phytopathology71, 590–592 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loper J.E., Haack C., Schroth M.N.: Population dynamics of soil pseudomonads in the rhizosphere of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.).Appl. Env. Microbiol.49, 416–422 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loper J.E., Schroth M.N.: Influence of bacterial sources of indole-3-acetic acid on root elongation of sugar beet.Phytopathology76, 386–389 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J.P.: Use of acid rose bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi.Soil Sci.69, 215–232 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parke J.L., Mocu R., Rovira A.D., Bowen G.D.: Soil water flow affects the rhizosphere distribution of a seed-borne biological control agent,Pseudomonas fluorescens.Soil Biol. Biochem.18, 583–588 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Přikryl Z., Vančura V., Wurst M.: Auxin formation by rhizosphere bacteria as a factor of root growth.Biol. Plant.27, 159–163 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouatt J.W., Katznelson H.: A study of the bacteria on the root surface and in the rhizosphere soil of crop plants.J. Appl. Bact.24, 164–171 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovira A.D.: Zones of exudation along plant roots and spatial distribution of micro-organisms in the rhizosphere.Pestic. Sci.4, 361–366 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sands D.C., Rovira A.D.:Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype G, the dominant fluorescent pseudomonas in south Australian soils and wheat rhizosphere.J. Appl. Bact.34, 261–275 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schippers B., Bakker A.W., Bakker A.H.M.: Interactions of deleterious and beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms and the effect of cropping practices.Ann. Rev. Phytopathol.25, 339–358 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth M.N., Hancock J.G.: Selected topics in biological control.Ann. Rev. Microbiol.35, 453–476 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suslow T.W., Schroth M.N.: Rhizobacteria of sugar-beets: Effects of seed application and root colonization on yield.Phytopathology72, 199–206 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor C.B.: The nutritionla requirements of the predominant flora in the soil.Proc. Soc. Appl. Bact.14, 101–111 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vraný J., Fiker A.: Growth and yields of potato plants inoculated with rhizosphere bacteria.Folia Microbiol.29, 248–253 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vraný J., Rasochová M., Dobiáš K., Horáčková V.: Fusaria on surface of tubers of selected varieties of potatoes.Zbl. Mikrobiol.144, 399–404 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vraný J., Rasochová M., Fiker A., Dobiáš K. Inoculation of potatoes with microorganisms under field conditions. I. Effect of plant growth, yields and physiological properties of tubers in potato and sugar-beet regions.Folia Microbiol.35, 000-000 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipps J.M., Lynch J.M.: The influence of the rhizosphere on crop productivity.Adv. Microbiol.9, 187–244 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong P.T.W., Griffin D.M.: Bacterial movement at high matric potentials. I. In artificial and natural soils.Soil. Biol. Biochem.8, 215–218 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vraný, J., Rasocha, V. & Hausvater, E. Inoculation of potatoes with microorganisms under field conditions. Folia Microbiol 35, 336–347 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02821285

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02821285

Keywords

Navigation