Skip to main content
Log in

Upset in response to a Sibling’s partner’s infidelities

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using data collected from people with at least one brother and one sister, and consistent with an evolutionary perspective, we find that older men and women (a) are more upset by a brother’s partner’s sexual infidelity than by her emotional infidelity and (b) are more upset by a sister’s partner’s emotional infidelity than by his sexual infidelity. There were no effects of participant sex or sex of in-law on upset over a sibling’s partner’s infidelities, but there was an effect of participant sex on reports of upset over one’s own partner’s infidelities. The results suggest that the key variable among older participants is the sex of the sibling or, correspondingly, the sex of the sibling’s partner, as predicted from an evolutionary analysis of reproductive costs, and not the sex of the participant, as predicted from a socialization perspective. Discussion offers directions for future work on jealousy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buss, D. M.2000The Dangerous Passion. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M.2003The Evolution of Desire, revised ed. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., R. J. Larsen, D. Westen, and J. Semmelroth1992 Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology.Psychological Science 3:251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., T. K. Shackelford, L. A. Kirkpatrick, J. Choe, K. L. Hang, M. Hasegawa, T. Hasegawa, and K. Bennett1999 Jealousy and the Nature of Beliefs about Infidelity: Tests of Competing Hypotheses about Sex Differences in the United States, Korea, and Japan.Personal Relationships 6:125–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., M. Wilson, and S. J. Weghorst1982 Male Sexual Jealousy.Ethology and Sociobiology 3:11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSteno, D. A., and P. Salovey 1996 Evolutionary Origins of Sex Differences in Jealousy: Questioning the “Fitness” of the Model.Psychological Science 7:367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, P., H. A. K. Groothof, G. A. Poel, T. T. G. Laverman, M. Schrier, and B. P. Buunk 2001 Sex Differences in the Events That Elicit Jealousy among Homosexuals.Personal Relationships 8:41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. 1987Sex Differences in Social Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A., and W. Wood 1991 Explaining Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Meta-analytic Perspective.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17:306–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenigstein, A., and R. Peltz 2002 Distress over the Infidelity of a Child’s Spouse: A Crucial Test of Evolutionary and Social-ization Hypotheses.Personal Relationships 9:301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, J. W., and E. Seely 2000 The Evolution of Sex Differences in Jealousy: Failure to Replicate Previous Results.Jour-nal of Research in Personality 34:348–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. R. 2000 Psychophysiological Responses to Imagined Infidelity: The Specific Innate Modular View of Jealousy Reconsidered.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78:1082–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. R.2002 Sexual and Romantic Jealousy in Heterosexual and Homosexual Adults.Psychological Science 13:7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. R., and N. Christenfeld 1996 Gender, Jealousy, and Reason.Psychological Science 7:364–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., D. M. Buss, and K. Bennett 2002 Forgiveness or Breakup: Sex Differences in Responses to a Partner’s Infidelity.Cognition and Emotion 16:299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., R. L. Michalski, and D. P. Schmitt 2004 Upset in Response to a Child’s Partner’s Infidelities.European Journal of Social Psychology 34:489–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. 1979The Evolution of Human Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B.G., and L. S. Fidell 2001Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard L. Michalski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michalski, R.L., Shackelford, T.K. & Salmon, C.A. Upset in response to a Sibling’s partner’s infidelities. Hum Nat 18, 74–84 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02820847

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02820847

key words

Navigation