Skip to main content
Log in

Men’s reproductive investment decisions

Mating, Parenting, and Self-perceived Mate Value

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using questionnaire data completed by 170 men, we examine variation in paternal investment in relation to the trade-off between mating and parenting. We found that as men’s self-perceived mate value increases, so does their mating effort, and in turn, as mating effort increases, paternal investment decreases. This study also simultaneously examined the influence on parental investment of men’s mating effort, men’s perception of their mates’ fidelity, and their perceived resemblance to their offspring. All predicted investment. The predictors of investment are also tested independently for men who are still in a relationship with the mother of their children and those that are separated from her. Finally we examine how self-perceived mate value affects how men respond to variation in paternity confidence. Men with a self-perceived low mate value were less likely to respond to lowered mate fidelity by reducing their parental investment compared with men with a self-perceived high mate value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R., and K. Noonan 1979 Concealment of Ovulation, Parental Care, and Human Social Evolution. InEvolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, N. I. A. Chagnon and W. Irons, eds. Pp. 436–453. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. G., H. Kaplan, D. Lam, and J. Lancaster 1999 Paternal Care by Genetic Fathers and Stepfathers II: Reports by Xhosa High School Students.Evolution and Human Behavior 20:433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apicella, C. L., and F. W. Marlowe 2004 Perceived Mate Fidelity and Paternal Resemblance Predict Men’s Investment in Children.Evolution and Human Behavior 25:371–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereczkei, T., S. Voros, A. Gal, and L. Bernath 1997 Resources, Attractiveness, Family Commitment; Reproductive Decisions in Human Mate Choice.Ethology 103:681–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blurton Jones, N. G., F. W. Marlowe, K. Hawkes and J. F. O’Connell 2000 Paternal Investment and Hunter-Gatherer Divorce Rates. InAdaptation and Human Behavior, L. Cronk, N. Chagnon, and W. Irons, eds. Pp. 69–90. New York: Adeline de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley, N. 1988 The Differential Allocation Hypothesis: An Experimental Test.American Naturalist 132:611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. 2002 Human Mate Guarding.Neuroendocrinology Letters 23:23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buston, P. M., and S. T. Emlen 2003 Cognitive Processes Underlying Human Mate Choice: The Relationship between Self-perception and Mate Preference in Western Society.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100:8805–8810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1991The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T.H., and A. C. J. Vincent 1991 Sexual Selection and the Potential Reproductive Rates of Males and Females.Nature 351:58–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, P., and H. C. Harpending 1982 Father Absence and Reproductive Strategy: An Evolutionary Perspective.Journal of Anthropological Research 38:255–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, P., and H. C. Harpending 1988 A Sociobiological Perspective on the Development of Human Reproductive Strategies. InSociobiological Perspectives on Human Development, K. B. MacDonald, ed. Pp. 340–372. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, M. V. 1988 Step- and Genetic Parent/Offspring Relationships in a Caribbean Village.Ethology and Sociobiology 9:335–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. 2000 Evolution and Proximate Expression of Human Paternal Investment.Psychological Bulletin 126:55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttentag, M., and P. F. Secord 1983Too Many Women: The Sex Ratio Question. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., and R. Thornhill 1997 The Evolutionary Psychology of Extrapair Sex: The Role of Fluctuating Asymmetry.Evolution and Human Behavior 18:69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., A. R. Rogers, and E. L. Charnov 1995 The Male’s Dilemma: Increased Offspring Production Is More Paternity to Steal.Evolutionary Ecology 9:662–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, K. M., and C. Hadley 1998 Dichotomous Male Reproductive Strategies in a Polygynous Human Society: Mating versus Parental Effort.Current Anthropology 39:269–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, B. S., ed. 1992Father-Child Relations. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., and H. Kaplan 1988 Tradeoffs in Male and Female Reproductive Strategies among the Ache, Part 2. InHuman Reproductive Behavior, L. Betzig, P. Turke, and M. Borgerhoff-Mulder, eds. Pp. 277–306. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, A. M., and K. Hill 1992 Paternal Effect on Offspring Survivorship among Ache and Hiwi Hunter-Gatherers: Implications for Modeling Pair-Bond Stability. InFather-Child Relations: Cultural and Biosocial Contexts, B. Hewlett, ed. Pp. 31–55. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., R. Turrisi, and C. K. Wan 1990Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 72. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., D. M. Burt, I. S. Penton-Voak, and D. I. Perrett 2001 Self-perceived Attractiveness Influences Human Female Preferences for Sexual Dimorphism and Symmetry in Male Faces.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (B) 268:39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F. 1999 Male Care and Mating Effort among Hazda Foragers.Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 46:57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F. 2000 Paternal Investment and the Human Mating System.Behavioural Processes 51:45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1977 Parental Investment: A Prospective Analysis.Animal Behaviour 25:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, J., J. Groslouis, and A. Richards 1996 Sexual Dimorphism, the Operational Sex-Ratio, and the Intensity of Male Competition in Polygynous Primates.American Naturalist 147:966–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérusse, D. 1994 Mate Choice in Modern Societies: Testing Evolutionary Hypotheses with Behavioral Data.Human Nature 5:255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher, T. E., and B. J. Stutchbury 2000 Extraterritorial Forays and Male Parental Care in Hooded Warblers.Animal Behaviour 59:1261–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. J., and P. Bobko 1992 Moderated Regression Analysis and Likert Scales: Too Coarse for Comfort?Journal of Applied Psychology 77:336–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, B. C. 2002 Relating Paternity to Paternal Care.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 357:341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B., and D. J. Gubernick 1992 Male-Infant Relationships in Nonhuman Primates: Paternal Investment or Mating Effort? InFather-Child Relations: Cultural and Biosocial Contexts, B. Hewlett, ed. Pp. 1–30. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R., and A. MØller 1997 Developmental Stability, Disease and Medicine.Biological Reviews 72:497–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., and S. W. Gangestad 1994 Fluctuating Asymmetry and Human Sexual Behavior.Psychological Science 5:297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. 1972 Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. InSexual Selection and the Descent of Man: 1871–1971, B. Campbell, ed. Pp. 136–179. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. J. 1995 The Ecology of Sexual Selection: Mean Crowding of Females and Resource-Defense Polygyny.Evolutionary Ecology 9:118–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. J., and S. M. Shuster 2002 The Evolution of Parental Care in the Context of Sexual Selection: A Critical Reassessment of Parental Investment Theory.American Naturalist 160:285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waynforth, D. 1998 Fluctuating Asymmetry and Human Male Life-History Traits in Rural Belize.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265:1497–1501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waynforth, D. 1999 Differences in Time Use for Mating and Nepotistic Effort as a Function of Male Attractiveness in Rural Belize.Evolution and Human Behavior 20:19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waynforth, D., and R. I. M. Dunbar 1995 Conditional Mate Choice Strategies in Humans: Evidence from “Lonely Hearts” Advertisements.Behaviour 132:755–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat, D. F. 1988 Male Parental Care and Extra-pair Copulations in the Indigo Bunting.Auk 105:149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat, D. F., and P. W. Sherman 1993 Parentage and the Evolution of Parental Behavior.Behavioral Ecology 4:66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham, L. A., and P. O. Dunn 1998 Male Parental Effort and Paternity in a Variable Mating System.Animal Behavior 55:629–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. 1998 Paternity and Paternal Care. InSperm Competition and Sexual Selection, T. R. Birkhead and A. P. MØller, eds. Pp. 117–145. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Coren L. Apicella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Apicella, C.L., Marlowe, F.W. Men’s reproductive investment decisions. Hum Nat 18, 22–34 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02820844

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02820844

Key Words

Navigation