Skip to main content
Log in

Minority businesses serving government clients amidst prolonged chaos in preferential procurement programs

  • Articles
  • Published:
The Review of Black Political Economy

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bates, Timothy. 1997.Race, Self-Employment, and Upward Mobility (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Timothy. 1995. “An Analysis of the SSBIC Program: Problems and Prospects”. Final Report to the U. S. Small Business Administration under SBIC-94-001-01.

  • Bates, Timothy. 1990. “Entrepreneurial Human Capital Inputs and Small Business Longevity,”Review of Economics and Statistics vol. 72 (4):551–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Timothy, and Darrell Williams. 1995. “Preferential Procurement Programs and Minority-Owned Businesses,”Journal of Urban Affairs vol. 17(1): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston, Thomas. 1999.Affirmative Action and Black Entrepreneurship (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunderl, Josef, Peter Preisdorfer, and Rolf Zeigler. 1992. “Survival Chances of Newly Formed Business Organizations.”American Sociological Review vol. 57(1): 227–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Richard. 1998. “Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms,”Journal of Economic Literature vol. 36(4): 1947–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Arnold, F. Gimeno-Gascon, and Catherine Woo. 1994. “Initial Human Capital and Financial Capital as Predictors of New Venture Performance,”Journal of Business Venturing vol. 9 (4):371–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copelin, Sherman. 1993. “Hearings before the Commerce, Consumer, and Monetary Affairs Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives; Hearings held July 12, 1993.” (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, David, and Boyan Jovanovic. 1989. “An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice Under Liquidity Constraints”Journal of Political Economy vol. 97 (4): 808–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, David, and Linda Leighton. 1989. “Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship,”American Economic Review vol. 79 (3): 519–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, Robert. 1999. “The Absence of the African American Owned Business: An Analysis of the Dynamics of Self-Employment,”Journal of Labor Economics vol. 17 (1): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimeno, J., T. Folta, Arnold Cooper, and Catherine Woo. 1997. “Survival of the Fittest: Entrepreneurial Human Capital and the Persistence of Underperforming Firms,”Administrative Science Quarterly vol. 42 (4): 750–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grown, Caren, and Timothy Bates. 1991. “Commercial Bank Lending to Black-Owned Construction Firms,”Journal of Urban Affairs vol. 14 (1): 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, Michael, and Glenn Yago. 1999.Mainstreaming Minority Business (Santa Monica: Milken Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin, D., D. Joulfarian, and H. Rosen. 1994. “Sticking It Out: Entrepreneurial Survival and Liquidity Constraints,”Journal of Political Economy vol. 102 (1): 53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies. 1993.Assessment of State and Local Government Minority Business Development Programs. Report to the U. S. Department of Commerce Minority Business Development Agency.

  • Jovanovic, Boyan. 1982. “Selection and Evolution of Industry,”Econometrica vol. 50 (3): 649–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Parren. 1992. “Hearings on Small Disadvantaged Business Issues before the Investigations Subcommittee of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives; Hearings held July 10 and 11, 1991,” (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Samuel, and Tsze Chan. 1996. “Who Benefits from Minority Business Set-Asides? The Case of New Jersey,”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management vol. 15 (2): 202–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Michael. 1993. “State and Local Government Set-Aside Programs, Disparity Studies, and Minority Business Development in the Post-Croson Era.”Journal of Urban Affairs vol. 15 (4): 529–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Commission on Minority Business Development. 1993.Final Report (Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziera, Joseph. 1987. “Investment as a Process of Search,”Journal of Political Economy vol. 95 (1): 204–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Data analysis reported in this study was conducted on-site at the U.S. Bureau of the Census Center for Economic Studies. Findings do not reflect the views of the Census Bureau, nor does the Bureau endorse or pass judgment upon the validity of the findings presented here. Funding support from the U.S. Small Business Administration is acknowledged: their funds were helpful, but their delays, ever-changing personnel assigned to oversee this project, and occasional lapses in professionalism were not.

About this article

Cite this article

Bates, T. Minority businesses serving government clients amidst prolonged chaos in preferential procurement programs. Rev Black Polit Econ 29, 51–70 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02820708

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02820708

Keywords

Navigation