Skip to main content

Critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research studies

Abstract

The ability to critically appraise literature is an essential skill for clinicians adopting a population perspective. Conventions exist for reporting and evaluating the quality of quantitative and epidemiological research. The same traditions do not exist in qualitative research for a number of reasons including the number of theories under which this type of research can be conducted and the subsequent incompatibility of indicators of quality. This paper presents a 10-point checklist for assessing the quality of qualitative research in clinical epidemiological studies. We aim to provide a framework for critical appraisal as well as offer direction for qualitative researchers in designing and publishing their work.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Creswell J.W.Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. London; Sage, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Connor L, Treloar C, Higginbotham N. How to perform transdisciplinary research: Qualitative methods and approaches. In: Higginbotham N, Albrecht G, Connor L eds.Health Social Science: A Transdisciplinary Perspective. Oxford University Press (in press).

  3. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS.Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks; Sage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knafl KA, Howard MJ. Interpreting and reporting qualitative research.Research in Nursing and Health 1984; 7: 17–24.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cobb AK, Hagemaster JN. Ten criteria for evaluating qualitative research proposals.J Nurs Educ 1987; 26: 138–143.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Krahn G, Hohn MF, Kime C. Incorporating qualitative approaches into clinical child psychology research.J Clin Child Psychol 1995; 24: 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Banister P, Burman E, Parker I, Taylor M, Tindall C.Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide. Buckingham; Open University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glaser B, Strauss A.Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago; Aldine de gruyter, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Britten N, Jones R, Murphy E, Stacy R. Qualitative research methods in general practice and primary care.Family Practice 1995; 12: 104–114.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stiles WB. Quality control in qualitative research.Clin Psychol Rev 1993;13:593–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patton MQ.Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park; Sage Publications, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuzel AJ. Sampling in qualitative enquiry. In: Crabtree BJ, Miller WL eds.Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park; Sage Publications, 1992; 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Borman KM, LeCompte MD, Goetz JP. Ethnographic and qualitative research design and why it doesn't work.American Behavioral Scientist 1986; 30: 42–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernard HR. Unstructured and semistructured interviewing. In:Research Methods in Culutural Anthropology. Newbury Park; Sage Publications, 1988; 203–229.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morgan DL. When to use focus groups and why. In:Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art. Newbury Park; Sage Publications, 1993; 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Adler PA, Adler P. Observational techniques. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YSeds.Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks; Sage Publications, 1994; 377–392.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hodder I. Ther interpretation of documents and material culture. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS eds.Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks; Sage Publications, 1994; 393–402.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miles M, Huberman A.Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source Book of New Methods. London; Sage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Strauss AL.Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guba EG, Lincoln YS.Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park; Sage Publications, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Willms D, Johnson N.Essentials in Qualitative Research: A Notebook for the Field. 1993.

  22. Engel JD, Kuzel AJ. On the idea of what constitutes good qualitative inquiry.Qualitative Health Research 1992; 2: 504–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Treloar, C., Champness, S., Simpson, P.L. et al. Critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research studies. Indian J Pediatr 67, 347–351 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02820685

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02820685

Key words

  • Critical appraisal
  • Qualitative methods
  • Epidemiological research