Skip to main content
Log in

Convergent technologies in distance learning delivery

  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Convergent technologies are beginning to make an impact on the delivery of learning material at a distance in the U.K. The author predicts that as course providers purchase more telematics equipment, two things will happen. First, as has been historically the case with the adoption of new technologies, costs of units will decrease as the user base increases. Second, and perhaps more important, users will discover and develop new and innovative techniques to exploit the capabilities of the technology. The only limits to innovation will be the imagination of the proponents of the new technologies. Time will reveal just how fast these developments occur

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chickering, A. W. & Ehrmann, S. C (1994).Implementing seven principles of good practice: Technology as lever. Occasional Paper. Paris, France: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, K. & McNieve, A. (1993, October). The social implications of telework for teleworkers. InConference Proceedings: Psychological Aspects of Teleworking in Rural Areas (PATRA), Dublin, Ireland.

  • Hiltz, S. R. (1986). The virtual classroom: Using computer mediated communication for university teaching.Journal of Communication, 36(2), 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiltz, S. R. & Turoff, M. (1979). The network nation — Human communication via computer. In E. B. Kerr & S. R. Hiltz (1982).Computer mediated communication systems: Status and evaluation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, A. (1996). Convergence and media for teaching and learning,Innovations in Education and Technology International, 33(1), 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, A. & Davis, W. (1979). Personal computer networks: Better than the next best thing to being there.Coevol Quarterly, Summer, 114–119.

  • Lewis, R. (1995). The creation of an open learning environment in HE.Innovation & Learning in Education, 1(2), 32–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D. (1991). Case Study: The educational use of computer conferencing.Education and Training Technology International, 27(2), 190–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oborne, D. (1993, October). An infrastructure for teleworking. InConference Proceedings: Psychological Aspects of Teleworking in Rural Areas (PATRA), Dublin, Ireland.

  • Theobald, R. (1980). The communications era from the year 2000. In E. B. Kerr & S. R. Hiltz (1982).Computer mediated communication systems: Status and evaluation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson, J. H. (1991). Simulation at a distance using computer conferencing.Education and Training Technology International, 27(3), 284–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, D. (1989).Assessing students: How shall we know them? London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, K. (1994). Some applications of distance education technologies and pedagogies in rural schools in New Zealand.Distance Education, 15(2), 318–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wheeler, S. Convergent technologies in distance learning delivery. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 43, 19–22 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02818160

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02818160

Keywords

Navigation