Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The protection of the financial interests of the EU in the candidate states.

Perspectives on The Future of Judicial Integration in Europe

  • Published:
ERA Forum Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  1. http://www.era.int/domains/corpus-juris/public/index.htm; Username: Corpusjuris, Codeword: 4DuraLexlsedLex

References

  1. JHA Council on 28 May 1998,Official Journal No. C 220, 15.07.1998.

  2. EU Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union, Brussels, 29 May 2000,Official Journal No. C 197, 12.07.2000, p.1.

  3. Official Journal No. L 140, 14.06.2000, p. 1.

  4. Official Journal No. L 324, 21.12.2000.

  5. Nice, 26 February 2001,Official Journal No. C 80, 10.03.2001, p. 1.

  6. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,Official Journal No. C 364, 18.12.2000, p.1.

  7. Delmas-Marty, M. (ed),Corpus introducing penal provisions for the purpose of the financial interests of the European Union, Economica, 1997.

  8. Delmas-Marty, M. and Vervaele, J. (eds),The implementation of the Corpus Juris in the member states, Intersentia, 2000.

  9. Seeinfra, Proposals for consideration at the Laeken summit, p. 132.

  10. Infra, Summing up of Recommendations, p. 137

  11. Council on 28 May 2001,Official Journal No. C 216/14, 01.08.2001.

  12. Infra, Summing up of Recommendations, p. 137

  13. Seeinfra, Proposals for consideration at the Laeken summit, p. 132.

  14. Official Journal No. C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48. The acronym “PIF-Convention” stems from the French title of the convention and the words Protection des IntérÊts Financiers. There is a proposal for the “reformatting” of this convention (and its additional protocols) in the form of a EU-directive: Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the criminal-law protection of the Community’s financial interests, presented by the Commission, 23 May 2001, Doc. COM (2001) 272 final,Official Journal No. C 240 E/125, 28.08.2001.

  15. Council Regulation (EC, EUFWOM) No. 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests,Official Journal No. L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 1–4.

  16. Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Vienna, 20 December 1988,International Legal Materials 1989, 493.

  17. European Treaty Series, No. 141.

  18. EC-Directive No. 91 /308 on the Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purpose of Money Laundering,Official Journal No. L 166, 28.06.1991, p. 77.

  19. Second Protocol to the Convention on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests, Luxemburg 19 June 1997,Official Journal No. C 221, 19.07.1997, p.11.

  20. Council Framework Decision of 26 June 2001 on money laundering, the identification, tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime,Official Journal No. L 182, 05.07.2001, p. 1.

  21. Delmas-Marty, M. and Vervaele, J. (eds),op. cit., 193.

  22. Joint Action on making it a Criminal Offence to Participate in a Criminal Organization in the member states of the European Union,Official Journal No. L 351, 29.12.1998, p. 1.

  23. Protocol drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union to the Convention on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests, Brussels, 27 September 1996,Official Journal No. C 313, 23.10.1996, p. 2.

  24. Joint Action on Corruption in the Private SectorOfficial Journal No. L 358,31.12.1998, p.2. Only three current member states have to date (September 2001) implemented this joint action.

  25. Delmas-Marty, M., “Necessity, legitimacy and feasibility of theCorpus Juris” in Delmas-Marty, M. and Vervaele, J. (eds), Theimplementation of the Corpus Juris in the memberstates, Intersentia, 2000, 66–67.

  26. Implementing provision, Delmas-Marty, M. and Vervaele, J.,op. cit., 191.

  27. Delmas-Marty, M,op. cit., 70.

  28. Official Journal No. L 140, 14.06.2000, p. 1. See also Framework Decision of 28 May 2001 combating fraud and counterfeiting of non-cash means of payment,Official Journal No. L 149, 02.06.2001, p. 1–4.

  29. International Convention for the Suppression of Counterfeiting Currency, and Protocol, Geneva, 20 April 1929, League of Nations,Treaty Series Vol. 112, p. 371.

  30. Council Regulation (EC) No. 1338/2001 of 28June 2001 laying down measures for the protection of the Euro against counterfeiting,Official Journal No. L 181,4.7.2001, p. 6–10.

  31. Proposal I,infra, Proposals for consideration at the Laeken summit, p, 132.

  32. seesupra, Chapter 1.

  33. Official Journal No. C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48.

  34. Second Protocol to the Convention on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests, Luxemburg 19 June 1997,Official Journal No. C 221, 19.07.1997, p.11.

  35. Convention on the Fight against Corruption involving Officials of the European Communities or Officials of Member States of the European Union, Brussels, 26 May 1997,Official Journal No. C 195, 25.06.1997, p. 2.

  36. Joint Action on Corruption in the Private SectorOfficial Journal No. L 358, 31.12.1998, p.2.

  37. Official Journal No. L 140, 14.06.2000, p. 1.

  38. loc. cit. and art. 3 of the Draft Council Framework Decision on the strengthening of the penal framework to prevent the facilitation of unauthorised entry and residence, 10075/01 DROIPEN 54 MIGR 51 COMIX 457, 05.07.2001, p. 9 and art. 7

  39. Delmas-Marty, M,op. cit., 72.

  40. Delmas-Marty, M,op. cit., 73.

  41. Delmas-Marty, M,op. cit. p. 76 (French version only).

  42. Van Binsbergen, W.C., “Ledroit pénal des Communautés Européennes”, in Droit pénal européen, Brussels, Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles, 1970, p. 204.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Regulation No. 17/62, First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty,Official Journal No. 013, 21.02.1962, p. 0204–0211.

  44. Council Regulation (EC, EURATOM) No. 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests,Official Journal No. L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 1–4.

  45. Delmas-Marty,op. cit., 74.

  46. Delmas-Marty, M,op. cit., 72.

  47. see supra, Chapter 1.

  48. Officiai Journal No. L 182, 05.07.2001, p. 1

  49. See alsoinfra, Chapter 8 (Recovery).

  50. Delmas-Marty,op. cit., 77.

  51. Text quotedinfra, footnote 109.

  52. infra, Proposals for consideration at the Laeken summit, p, 132.

  53. infra, Chapter 6 (Procedural rights).

  54. Van den Wyngaert, C. etal. (eds), Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community, Butterworth, 1993; Proceedings of the seminar on “The future of the public prosecutor’s office in the European Union”, Leuven, 25 May 2000 inEuropean Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 2000, 149–318.

  55. Bruner, G., “Verfassungsrechtliche Anpassung der BeitrittslÄnder an die EU-Mitgliedschaft”, to be published in W. Heusel (ed.), Schriftenreihe of the Academy of European Law, Vol. 35, Proceedings of ERA Annual Congress, 2000.

  56. Albrecht, H.-J., “Criminal prosecution; developments, trends and open questions in the federal republic of Germany”, inEuropean Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 2000, 245–256.

  57. First evaluation exercise on mutual assistance in criminal matters of the Council (2001),infra. Chapter 10, footnote 91 and the quote in the text corresponding to footnote 128.

  58. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Rome, 17 July 1998, U.N. Doc. A/Conf. 183/9,International Legal Materials 1998, 999.

  59. Conseil Constitutionnel 5 January 1999, Nℴ. 98-408 DC, Revuedu Droit Public 1999, p. 471; Loi constitutionelle nℴ 99-568 du 8 juillet 1999,Journal Officiel 9 juillet 1999, p. 10175.

  60. Seeinfra, Proposals for consideration at the Laeken summit, p. 132.

  61. European Parliament, Committee of Independent Experts, Second Report on Reform of the Commission. Analysis of current practice and proposals for tackling mismanagement, irregularities and fraud, 10 September 1999.

  62. Infra, Proposals for consideration at the Laeken summit, p. 132.

  63. Infra, Proposals for consideration at the Laeken summit, p. 132.

  64. Delmas-Marty, M,op. cit., p. 97.

  65. Second Protocol to the Convention on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests (1997),Official Journal No. C 221, 19.07.1997, p. 11.

  66. EU Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union, Brussels, 29 May 2000,Official Journal No. C 197, 12.07.2000, p, 1.

  67. Council of Europe, Final Draft Convention On Cyber-Crime, Strasbourg, 22 June 2001 CDPC (2001)17, Addendum I.

  68. AM & S Europe Limited v Commission of the European Communities, Case 155/79,European Court Reports 1982, p. 1575.

  69. Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No. 1150/2000 of 22 May 2000 implementing Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom on the system of the Communities’ own resources,Official Journal No, L 130, 31.05.2000, p. 1–12.

  70. Council on 28 May 2001,infra, note 97, 15.94 Presidency Conclusions, Tampere European Council, 15 and 16 October 1999, SN 200/99/CAB/EN/I.

  71. Evan Bell, “A European DPP to Prosecute Euro-fraud?”,Criminal Law Review 2000, 154–168.

  72. Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts, Amsterdam, 2 October 1997,Official Journal No. C 340, 10.11.1997, p. 1, hereinafter referred to as TEU.

  73. Treaty of Nice, Amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts, Nice, 26 February 2001,Official Journal No. C 80, 10.03.2001, p. 1.

  74. European Parliament, Resolution on criminal procedures in the European Union (Corpus Juris), 16 April 1999.

  75. Council on 28 May 2001,Official Journal No. C 216/14, 01.08.2001, particularly Recommendation 15.

  76. Council Decision of 14 December 2000 setting up a Provisional Judicial Cooperation Unit,Official Journal No. L 324, 21.12.2000.

  77. Council of a Framework Decision on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing assets or evidence, Brussels, 2 February 2001, 5126/01; E. Barbe, “Une présentation du projet de décision-cadre relatif à la reconnaissance des décisions de gel des avoirs et des preuves”; G. Stessens, “The Joint Initiative of France, Sweden and Belgium for the Adoption of a Council Framework Decision on the Execution in the European Union of Orders Freezing Assets or Evidence”; J. Schutte, “Commentaires sur le projet de décision-cadre relatif à l’exécution dans l’Union européenne des décisions de gel des avoirs ou des preuves”, in G. de Kerchove et A. Weyembergh,La reconnaissance mutuelle des décisions judiciaires pénales dans l’Union européenne, Bruxelles, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 2001, forthcoming.

  78. R Bradley, “Mutual Recognition Applied to Financial Penalties”, in G. de Kerchove et A. Weyembergh,La reconnaissance mutuelle des décisions judiciaires pénales dans l’Union européenne, Bruxelles, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 2001, forthcoming.

  79. European Commission, Directorate-General of Justice and Home Affairs, Discussion paper on Extradition, 15 May 2001. This proposal is to be finalised by the end of September 2001.

  80. Proposal for a Directive Of The European Parliament And OfThe Council on the Protection of the Environment through Criminal Law, presented by the Commission, 13 March 2001, COM (2001 ) 139 final.

  81. The Commission, 23 May 2001, Doc. COM (2001) 272 final,Official Journal No. C 240 E/125, 28.08.2001.

  82. Draft Council Directive defining the facilitation of unauthorised entry, transit and residence, 10075/01 DROIPEN 54 MIGR 51 COMIX 457, 05.07.2001, p. 3.

  83. The Council on 28 May 2001,loc. cit., at 19.

  84. Weyembergh, A., “La coopération européenne en matière de justice et d’affaires intérieures ; vers un rééquilibrage du couple liberté-sécurité ?”,Revue Belge de Droit International 2000, forthcoming.

  85. European Convention on the Transfer of Proceedings in Criminal Matters, Strasbourg, 15 May 1972,European Treaty Series No. 73.

  86. European Convention on the International Validity of Criminal Judgments. The Hague, 28 May 1970,European Treaty Series No. 70.

  87. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,Official Journal No. C 364, 18.12.2000, p.1.

  88. Van den Wyngaert, C., “CorpusJuris, parquet européen et juge national: vers une chambre préliminaire européenne?”, in De Kerchove, G. and Weyembergh, A. (eds.),Vers un espace judiciaire pénal européen, Brussel, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 2000, 131–138; Delmas-Marty, M., “Combatting fraud — Necessity, legitimacy and feasability of theCorpus Juris”, Common Market Law Review 2000, 247–256;Van Gerven, W., “Constitutional conditions for a Public Prosecutor’s Office at the European level”,European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law andCriminal Justice 2000, 296–318.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Van den Wyngaert, C., “Corpusjuris, parquet européen et juge national. Vers une chambre préliminaire européenne?”, Agon nr. 23, 1999.

  90. Convention relating to Extradition between the Member States of the European Union, Brussels, 27 September 1996,Official Journal No. C 313, 23.10.1996, p. 11.

  91. Delmas-Marty, M. and Vervaele, J.A.E. (eds.),The implementation of the Corpus Juris in the Member States-La Mise en Oeuvre du Corpus Juris dans les Etats Membres, op. cit.

  92. Stephen Jacobi, quoted by M. Delmas-Marty in “Les défis du droit pénal européen”, typed manuscript, 1999, p. 3.

  93. Delmas-Marty, M. and Vervaele, J.A.E. (eds.),op. cit.

  94. European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, Strasbourg, 20 April 1959, EuropeanTreaty Series No. 30.

  95. Loc. cit., p. 15.

  96. Recommendation 4, on p. 19 of the Final Report of the Council, loc. cit

  97. EU Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union, Brussels, 29 May 2000,Official Journal No. C 197, 12.07.2000, p. 1.

  98. Loc. cit., at 22.

  99. European Convention on the International Validity of Criminal Judgments. The Hague, 28 May 1970,European Treaty Series No. 70.

  100. Final Report,loc. cit. (footnote 97), 17–22.

  101. Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters,Official Journal No. L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1.

  102. Official Journal No. C 12, 15.01.2001, p. 10.

  103. EC Directive No. 95/46 on the Protection of Individuals with regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of such Data, Brussels, 24 October 1995,Official Journal No. L 281, 23.11.1995, p.31.

  104. Regulation (EC) No.45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies on the free movement of such data,Official Journal No. L 8/1 of 12 January 2001.

  105. White, S., “Data protection and the protection of the financial interests”, Agon nr 28 (November 2000).

  106. Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, Strasbourg, 28 January 1981,European Treaty Series No. 108.

  107. White, S,loc. cit., p. 2 and 5. See also Vervaele and Klip, Administratieve en strafrechtelijke samenwerking inzake fraudebestrijding tussen justitiËle en bestuurlijke instanties van de EU-lidstaten. Eindrapport.WODC, 2001, 323 p.

  108. Supra, Chapter 1.

  109. Conclusions of Chapter 1 (p. 24), in fine.

  110. Helen Xanthaki, “The problem of quality in EU legislation: what on earth is really wrong?”,Common Market Law Review 2001, 651–676.

  111. Jan Wouters, “Institutional and constitutional challenges for the European Union — some reflections in the light of the Treaty of Nice”, EuropeanLaw Review 2001, 343, at 354.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Bruggeman, W., “Policing in Europe: a new wave?”, in Den Boer, M., et al.,The implementation of Schengen, Maastricht, EIPA, 1997, 172 p.

    Google Scholar 

  113. M. Delmas-Marty,“Les défis du droit pénal européen”, typed manuscript 1999.

  114. N.Walken “The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: Legal, Symbolic and Constitutional Implications”, in R J. Cullen and P.A. Zervakis, The Post-Nice Process:Towards a European Constitution?, forthcoming (Schriften des Zentrums für EuropÄische Integrationsforschung, vol. 49). See also K. Lenaerts and E. De Smijter “A ‘Bill of Rights’ for the European Union”, CommonMarket Law Review 2001, 273–300.

  115. Supra, footnote 29.

  116. The Council on 28 May 2001,Official Journal No. C 216/14,01.08.2001.

  117. Footnote 96.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Antwerp, USA

    Christine Van den Wyngaert (Professor of Law)

Authors
  1. Christine Van den Wyngaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van den Wyngaert, C. The protection of the financial interests of the EU in the candidate states.. ERA Forum 2, 2–60 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02817584

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02817584

Keywords

Search

Navigation