Skip to main content
Log in

Apomixis, hybridization, and taxonomic complexity in eastern north AmericanAmelanchier (Rosaceae)

  • Apomixis and Taxonomy Proceedings of the Symposium held in Pruhonice, Czech Republic 1995; edited by A.J. Richards, J. Kirschner, J. Stepanek & K. Marhold
  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Apomixis and hybridization together contribute to taxonomic complexity inAmelanchier. Hybridization combines genetically divergent genomes and spawns new forms that apomixis perpetuates. Apomixis is aposporous, facultative, and pseudogamous in the genus, and apomicts are generally polyploid, pollen fertile, and pollinated by generalists. That gene flow actually occurs is empirically evident. As apomixis is genetically dominant over sexuality, hybrids involving at least one apomictic parent are apomictic. Clonal reproduction may thus perpetuate F1 individuals and generate agamospecies. Alternatively hybrids may interbreed and backcross to create hybrid swarms or cross with species other than the parents. In eastern North America, the abundance of published names and general taxonomic confusion in the genus doubtless result at least in part from this interplay of apomixis and hybridization. The roles of apomixis and hybridization in diversification withinAmelanchier are examined in light of new data about breeding system of an apomictic, hybrid microspecies, informally namedA. “erecta” and its formation of a hybrid swarm with anotherAmelanchier apomict,A. laevis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold M.L., Backner C.M. &Robinson J.J. (1991): Pollen-mediated introgression and hybrid speciation in Louisiana irises.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88: 1348–1402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asker S.E. &Jerling L. (1992):Apomixis in plants, CRC Press, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer R.J. (1987): Evolution and phylogenetic relationships of theAntennaria (Asteraceae: Inuleae) polyploid agamic complexes.Biol. Zentralbl. 106: 683–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell C.S., Greene C.W., Neubauer B.F. &Higgins J.M. (1985): Apomixis inAmelanchier laevis, shadbush (Rosaceae, Maloidaeae).Amer. J. Bot. 72: 1397–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell C.S., Greene C.W. &Bergquist S.E. (1987): Apomixis and sexuality in three species ofAmelanchier, shadbush (Rosaceae: Maloideae).Amer. J. Bot. 74: 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell C.S., Greene C.W. &Dickinson T.A. (1991): Reproductive biology in theMaloideae (Rosaceae).Syst. Bot. 16: 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinq-Mars L. (1971): Le genreAmelanchier au Québec.Naturaliste Canad. 98: 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruise J.E. (1964): Studies of natural hybrids inAmelanchier.Canad. J. Bot. 42: 651–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czapik R. (1994): How to detect apomixis inAngiospermae.Polish Bot. Stud. 8: 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble A.C. (1995):Conservation biology of shadbush, Amelanchier (Rosaceae):Evidence from systematics, population structure, and reproductive ecology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maine, Orono.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson T.A. (1986): Topodeme differentiation in Ontario taxa ofCrataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae): Leaf morphometric evidence.Canad. J. Bot. 64: 2738–2747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson T.A. &Campbell C.S. (1991): Population structure and reproductive ecology in theMaloideae (Rosaceae).Syst. Bot. 16: 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson T.A. &Phipps J.B. (1985): Studies inCrataegus L. (Rosaceae: Maloideae). XIII. Degree and pattern of phenotypic variation inCrataegus sect.Crus-galli in Ontario.Syst. Bot. 10: 322–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favarger C. &Correvon P. (1967): Mise en évidence de “races chromosomiques” chez l'Amélanchier.Trav. Inst. Bot. Univ. Neuchâtel 14: 215–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernald M.L. (1950):Gray's manual of botany. American Book Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant V. (1981):Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson Å. (1946–1947): Apomixis in higher plants.Acta Univ. Lund. N.S., Sect. 2. 42–43: 1–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr J.M., Jr. (1971): A new clearing-squash technique for the study of ovule development in angiosperms.Amer. J. Bot. 58: 785–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds H.R. (1986):Flora of New Brunswick. Primrose Press, Fredericton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G.N. (1946):American species of Amelanchier. Urbana.

  • Kellogg B.A. (1990): Variation and species limits in agamospermous grasses.Syst. Bot. 15: 112–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner J. &Ŝtêpánek J. (1994): Clonality as a part of the evolution precess inTaraxacum.Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 29: 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalonde L.-M. (1957): A newAmelanchier of eastern Canada.Rhodora 59: 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry P. (1975). Le concept d'espèce et la taxinomie du genreAmelanchier (Rosacées).Bull. Soc. Bot. France 122: 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall D.R. &Weir B.S. (1979): Maintenance of genetic variation in apomictic plant populations. I. Single locus models.Heredity 42: 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen E.L. (1939): A taxonomic study of the genusAmelanchier in Minnesota.Amer. Midl. Naturalist 22: 160–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nogler G.A. (1984): Gametophytic apomixis. In:Johri B.M. (ed.),Embryology of the Angiosperms, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 475–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps J.B., Robertson K.R., Smith P.G. &Rohrer J.R. (1990): A checklist of the subfamilyMaloideae (Rosaceae).Canad. J. Bot. 68: 2209–2269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards A.J. (1986):Plant breeding systems. George Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg L.H. (1995): The role of hybridization in evolution: Old wine in new skins.Amer. J. Bot. 82: 944–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg L.H. &Wendel J.F. (1993): Introgression and its consequences. In:Harrison R.G. (ed.),Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 70–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson W.A. (1982): Experimental taxonomy in the genusAmelanchier. II. Do the taxa inAmelanchier form an agamic complex?Rhodora 84: 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf F.J. (1993):NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Exeter Software, Setauket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland A.E. &Smith E.C. (1969):The flora of Nova Scotia. The Nova Scotia Department of Education, Halifax.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. (1990):Statistical analysis system. SAS Institute, Cary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins G.L. (1950):Variation and evolution in plants, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss E.G. (1985):Michigan Flora. Part II. Dicots. Cranbrook Inst. Science Bull. 59 and University of Michigan Herbarium, Ann Arbor.

  • Weber J.E. &Campbell C.S. (1989): Breeding system of a hybrid between a sexual and an apomictic species ofAmelanchier, shadbush (rosaceae, Maloideae).Amer. J. Bot. 73: 341–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand K.M. (1912): The genusAmelanchier in eastern North America.Rhodora 14: 117–161.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell, C.S., Wright, W.A. Apomixis, hybridization, and taxonomic complexity in eastern north AmericanAmelanchier (Rosaceae) . Folia Geobot 31, 345–354 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02815379

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02815379

Key words

Navigation