Summary
The aim of this article is to reformulate the derivation of the master equation made by Fulinski and Kramarczyk, by introducing a boundary condition. This move facilitates physical interpretation. Comments will be included on the topic of the arrow of time.
Riassunto
Si tenta di riottenere, ponendo una condizione al contorno, la derivazione della master equation svolta da Fulinski e Kramarczik. Ciò facilita l’interpretazione fisica. Si fanno dei commenti anche sulla direzione del tempo.
qRезюме
Цель этой статьи — зан ово сформулировать вывод ‘ главного ’ уравнения, полученно го Фулшкжим и Крамарц ыком, посредством введени я граничного условия. Этот подход о блегчает физическую интерпретацию. Комме нтарии касаются вопроса о зн аке времени.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Krips:Nuovo Cimento,60 B, 278 (1969).
H. Krips:Nuovo Cimento,61 B, 12 (1969).
G. Emch:Helv. Phys. Acta,37, 533 (1964).
M. Naimark:Normed Rings (Groningen, 1964).
T. Kato:Perturbation Theory of Linear Operators (Berlin, 1966).
A. Fulinski andW. Kramarczyk:Physica,39, 575 (1968).
G. Emch:Helv. Phys. Acta,38, 164 (1965).
L. Schiff:Quantum Mechanics (New York, 1955).
N. van Kampen :Fundamental Problems in Statistical Mechanics, edited by Cohen (Amsterdam, 1962).
I. Percival:Journ. Math. Phys.,2, 235 (1961).
D. ter Haar:Rev. Mod. Phys.,27, 289 (1955).
E. Schrödinger:Statistical Thermodynamics (New York, 1960).
A. Grunbaum:Philosophical Problems of Space and Time (New York, 1963).
H. Reichenbach:The Direction of Time (Berkeley, 1956).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krips, H. The master equation and the arrow of time. Nuov Cim B 3, 153–170 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02815331
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02815331