Skip to main content
Log in

The mean size of plate martensite: influence of austenite grain size, partitioning, and transformation heterogeneity

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolution of transformation microstructure during martensite transformation is revisited. The influence of “spread” heterogeneity on current partitioning concepts is assessed. Following that, a method to infer details of martensite transformation in an average austenite grain is described. The results indicate that the mean martensite plate size may remain constant up to a significant extent of grain transformation. Moreover, it is found that the mean martensite plate volume in fine grain austenite is proportionally larger than that observed with coarse grain austenite, and these effects are ascribed to autocatalysis. Finally, a transformation model is derived which accurately describes the data up to Vv = 0.65, irrespective of austenite grain size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. R. C. Guimarães and J. C. Gomes:ICOMAT-79 Proceedings, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1979, pp. 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.C. Fisher, J. H. Hollomon, and D. Turnbull:Trans. AIME, 1949, vol. 185, pp. 691–700.

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. Raghavan and A. R. Entwisle: “Physical Properties of Bainite and Martensite,” The Iron and Steel Institute, Report 93, London, 1965, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S.R. Pati and M. Cohen:Acta Metall., 1969, vol. 17, pp. 189–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D.G. McMurtie and C.L. Magee:Metall. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, pp. 3185–91.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.G. Mendiratta and G. Krauss:Metall. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, pp. 1755–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J.R.C. Guimarães and J.C. Gomes:Metall. Trans. A, 1979, vol. 10A, pp. 109–12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Y. C. Chen and P. G. Winchell:Metall. Trans. A, 1976, vol. 7A, pp. 1177–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. W. Y. Chen, E. N. Jones, and P. G. Winchell:Metall. Trans. A, 1978, vol. 9A, pp. 1651–59.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.R.C. Guimarães: inSolid-Solid Phase Transformations Proc., H.I. Aaronson,et al., eds., TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1982, pp. 1415–19.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.L. Magee:Phase Transformation, ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1970, pp. 111–56.

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. Raghavan:Acta Metall., 1969, vol. 17, pp. 1299–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J.R.C. Guimarães and J.C. Gomes:Acta Metall., 1978, vol. 26, pp. 1591–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J.R.C. Guimarães and L. P. M. Brandão:Scripta Metall., 1980, vol. 14, pp. 305–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.R.C. Guimarães and A. Saavedra:Mat. Sci. & Engi., 1984, vol. 62, pp. 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P.-H. Chang: Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, 1981.

  17. P.-H. Chang, P. G. Winchell, and G. L. Liedl:Metall. Trans. A, 1983, vol. 14A, p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guimarães, J.R.C., Saavedra, A. The mean size of plate martensite: influence of austenite grain size, partitioning, and transformation heterogeneity. Metall Trans A 16, 329–336 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02814331

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02814331

Keywords

Navigation