Skip to main content
Log in

Drug policies: A study of the opinions of local law enforcement patrol officers about various policy alternatives

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article briefly reviews some literature describing the scope and seriousness of psychoactive substance misuse in the United States and then examines some chronic problems in the nature of public policy analysis. A methodology. Conceptual Review, is briefly discussed as a plausible alternative to contemporary approaches. Data from n=100 patrol officers who completed the Drug Policy Questionnaire (DPQ) are presented. Patrol officers were highly supportive of conventional policies, e.g., prevention, education, and treatment, but also recommended more punitive approaches, e.g., imprisonment for both dealers and users. Legalization was rejected as a viable policy alternative. Implications for policy and future research are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abadinsky, H. (1993).Drug Abuse: An Introduction-2nd ed., Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, E.M. (1972).Licit and illicit drugs: The Consumer Unions report on narcotics, stimulants, depressants, inhalants, hallucinogens and marifuana-including caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol. Boston: Little and Brown, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchton, M. (1994). A forward, p. xvi, in M. Falco,The making of a drug-free America: Programs that work. New York: Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falco, M. (1994).The making of a drug-free America: Programs that work. New York: Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gestein, D.R. & Harwood, H.J. (Eds.) (1990).Treating drug problems (vol. 1): A study of the evolution, effectiveness, and financing of public and private drug treatment systems, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P.D. (1994).American attitudes toward the drug problem and drug policy: Study #3942, Washington, D.C.: Peter Hart Research Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inciardi, J.A. (1986).The war on drugs: Heroin, cocaine, crime, and public policy, Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B.D., O’Malley, P.M. & Bachman, J.G. (1993).Drug use among American high school students, college students, and other young adults, 1975–1992. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien, R.M. (1995).A primer of drug action-7th ed) New York W.H. Freeman & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koven, S.G. & Shelley, M.C. (1993). No consensus on fighting the drug war: Differences between state policy elites and the mass public.The International Journal of the Addictions, 28(14), 1531–1548.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, K., Pastore, A.L., & Flannagan, T.J. (Eds.) (1993).Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics-1992, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, D.C.: Govermment Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W.J.T. (1982) Editors introduction: The politics of interpretation.Critical Inquiry, I, iii-viii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R.H. (1994, October). The Drug Policy Questionmaire (DPQ): A validation study with 300 college students. Paper presented to the Society of Police and Criminal Psychology, Madison, WI.

  • Musto, D. (1991). Opium, cocaine, and marijuana in American history,Scientific American, July, 1991, 40–47National Household Survey on Drug Abuse-1992. (1993). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Drug Abuse

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. & Marshall, J. (1993). Educational policy analysis and the politics of interpretation: The search for a well-defined problem.Evaluation Review, 17(3), 310–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., Marshall, J., & Shaw, R. (1986). The development and trials of a decision-making model: An evaluation.Evaluation Review, 10(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. & Robinson, V. (1984). The origins and status of action research.Journal of Applied Behavioral Research, 20(2), 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D.A. (1988).Policy paradox and political reason, Glenview, IL: Foresman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. (1974).Criminal Justice: The ritual persecution of drugs, addicts, and pushers, Garden City, NJ: Doubleday Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, M. (1990).Crime and Justice: A review of research, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, M. & Wilson J.Q. (Eds.) (1990):Drugs and crime, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.Q. (1990). Drugs and crime. In M. Tonry & J.Q. Wilson (Eds.),Crime and Justice, 13, pp. 521–545.

  • Wisotsky, S. (1990).Beyond the War on Drugs: Overcoming a Failed Public Policy. Butchel, NY: Prometheus Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, R.H., Palmiotto, M.J. Drug policies: A study of the opinions of local law enforcement patrol officers about various policy alternatives. J Police Crim Psych 12, 32–38 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02813809

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02813809

Keywords

Navigation