References
For the preliminary report seeS. Furuichi, T. Kodama, Y. Sugahara, A. Wakasa andM. Yonezawa:Prog. Theor. Phys.,16, 64 (1956) (L.). The details will soon be published also inProg. Theor. Phys. 17, No. 1.
J. Crussard:Proceedings of the Sixth Rochester Conference on High Energy Particle, 1956 (New York, to be published).
Recently reported events,W. A. Cooper, H. Filthuth, J. A. Newth andR. A. Salmeron:Nuovo Cimento,4, 390 (1956);R. Birge, D. H. Perkins, J. R. Peterson, D. H. Stork andM. N. Whitehead:Nuovo Cimento,4, 834 (1956), are also in favour of our present statement of Ke3.
Fermi interaction concerned here may be the one realized among (N, Λ(Σ), μ(e),ν).
J. Crussard, V. Fouché, J. Hennessy, G. Kayas, L. Leprince-Ringuet, D. Morellet andF. Renard:Nuovo Cimento,3, 731 (1956).
The notation such asS(A) means scalar K-particle and pseudovector Fermi interaction. As for its explicit form see reference (1). It should also be understood thatS(A) does not make any difference from its corresponding one with opposite parity, i.e.,PS(V) in our analysis.
G. Stack Collaboration:Nuovo Cimento,2, 1063 (1955).
D. M. Ritson, A. Pevsner, S. C. Fung, M. Widgoff, G. T. Zorn, S. Goldhaber andG. Goldhaber:Phys. Rev.,101, 1085 (1956).
Reference (4).
Vb is also the curve which has the largest rise in all combinations of interactions in spin 1 Kμ3.
The general feature of the distribution by high spin Ke3 can be well approximated by the final density curve.
W. D. Walker andW. D. Shephard:Phys. Rev.,101, 1810 (1956).
J. Orear, G. Harris andS. Taylor:Phys. Rev.,102, 1676 (1956).
L. Alvarez:Proceedings of Sixth Rochester Conference on High Energy Physics, 1956 (New York, to be published).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Furuichi, S., Sugahara, Y., Wakasa, A. et al. An analysis of rochester Kμ3 and Ke3 data. Nuovo Cim 5, 285–288 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02812837
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02812837