Skip to main content
Log in

Defects studies of semiconductor materials

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nature and cause of defects in bulk and epitaxial semiconductor material are determined by combining the information obtained from several different techniques. Etch pit count, X-ray diffraction for measurement of precise cell parameter, X-ray topography, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and electron microprobe analysis (EMA) are used to supplement each other. It is shown that more than one technique is necessary for a complete understanding of the defects. The approach is illustrated by three example: 1) The homogeneity study of GaAs wafers with equivalent doping but prepared under different conditions shows an excellent agreement between the amount of dislocations per sq cm obtained by the etch pit count, X-ray topography, and the degree of inhomogeneity as determined by variation ina 0 measurements. 2) The defects studies of the GaAsP epitaxial layer by X-ray topography, precise cell parameter measurements, SEM, and EMA indicate that the crystallographic defects are induced by misorientation during the growth process and by surface contamination of the substrate. 3) The examination of the surface defects of an etched silicon wafer by optical microscopy and X-ray topography indicates the presence of precipitates. Upon further studies using SEM and EMA it is shown that the defects are not precipitates but hillocks produced by surface contamination prior to the etching process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. H. Herzog and W. O. Groves:Semicond. Prod., 1962, pp. 25–28.

  2. E. D. Pierron and J. B. McNeely:Advan. X-ray Anal., 1969, vol. 12, p. 343.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. R. Lang:J. Appl. Phys., 1959, vol. 30, p. 748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. K. Howard and R. D. Dobrott:Appl. Phys. Letters, 1965, vol. 7, p. 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E. S. Meieran:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1968, vol. 242, p. 413.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. I. G. Davies, K. A. Hughes, D. V. Sulway, and P. R. Thornton:Solid State Electron., 1966, vol. 9, p. 275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. V. Sulway, I. G. Davies, K. A. Hughes, P. R. Thornton, and B. R. Holeman:Microelectronics and Reliability, 1966, vol. 5, p. 323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. A. Hughes and P. R. Thornton: Application of Scanning Electron Microscopy to Microelectronic Materials, Dept. of Materials Science, University College of North Wales, 1966.

  9. P. R. Thornton:The Physics of Electroluminescence Devices, E. and F. N. Spon, Ltd., London, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. A. Fergason:Advan. X-ray Anal., 1966, vol. 9, p. 265.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R. A. Vogel and L. A. Fergason:Rev. Sci. Instr., 1966, vol. 37, p. 934.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. L. A. Fergason:Anal. Chem., 1966, vol. 38, p. 1955.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pierron, E.D., Burd, J.W. & McNeely, J.B. Defects studies of semiconductor materials. Metall Trans 1, 639–642 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02811589

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02811589

Keywords

Navigation