Summary
Computer-Based Training is usually based upon modular branching paradigms familiar in print-based programmed learning materials. It successfully involves students actively in the instruction, but due to inherent limitations lacks the realism and immediacy of television.
Interactive video is a recent development in instructional technology, merging of computers and television. This marriage has produced a hybrid technology which can provide the structure and involvement of computerassisted instruction and the realism of television. For interactive video to realize its potential, rigorous design and technical requirements must be satisfied.
Educators and trainers can make informed decisions about the use of CBT versus IVD by studying the large body of research that deals with the instructional effectiveness of these technologies. Also, answering questions regarding learning outcomes, budget constraints, and other issues is critical before committing to one medium over the other. Knowing the advantages and disadvantages of each instructional system is key to selecting an appropriate and cost-effective instructional approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Atkinson, M.L. (1984). Computer-assisted instruction: Current state of the art.Computers in the Schools, 1:1, 91–99.
Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C.C. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in secondary schools.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 12:3, 59–68.
Belland, J.C., Taylor, W.D., Canelos, J., Dwyer, F. & Baker, P. (1985). Is the self-paced instructional program, via microcomputer-based instruction, the most effective method of addressing individual learning differences?ECTJ, Volume 33, 185–198.
Bright, G.W. (1983). Explaining the efficiency of computer assisted instruction.AEDS Journal, 12:16, 144–153.
Caldwell, R.M. (1988). Guidelines for developing basic skills instructional materials for use with microcomputer technology.Educational Technology, 20:11, 7–12.
Dalton, D.W. (1986). The efficacy of computer-assisted video instruction on rule learning and attitudes.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 13:4, 122–125.
Dence, M. (1980). Toward denning the role of CAI: A review.Educational Technology, 20:11, 50–54.
Garhart, C, & Hannafin, M.J. (1986). The accuracy of cognitive monitoring during computer-based instruction.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 13:3, 88–93.
Hannafin, M.J. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional order in the design of computer assisted instruction.Journal of Instructional Development, 7:3, 6–10.
Hon, D. (1983). The promise of interactive video: An effective search.Performance and Instruction Journal, 22:9, 21–23.
Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.C. & Cohen, P.A. (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings.Review of Educational Research, 50:4, 525–544.
Ross, S.M. (1984). Matching the lesson to the student: Alternative adaptive designs for individualized learning systems.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, Volume 11, 42–48.
Schwier, R. (1987).Interactive Video. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Shaw, M. (1985). Dancing with the disc: The latest step in training technology.Data Training, 4:2, 26–27.
Splittgerber, F.L. (1979). Computer-based instruction: A revolution in the making?Educational Technology, 19:1, 20–26.
Tiene, D., Evans, A., Callahan, B. & Buck, S. (1988). The instructional effectiveness of interactive video versus computer assisted instruction.Interact, Winter, 15–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franchi, J. CBT OR IVD?—That’s the question. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 37, 27–30 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02811519
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02811519