Skip to main content
Log in

Access to justice

  • Published:
Liverpool Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The central aim of providing access to justice should be to ensure that every citizen receives implementation of his legal rights at the lowest overall cost, not just the cost to litigants, or the courts' budget, or insurers, but to society as a whole. How far the proposals in the Report will achieve that will have to be seen when they are implemented, whether in whole or in part. Although the proposals are radical in many ways, it is certainly possible to argue that on one construction they merely preserve the present distinction between small claims, County Court, and High Court cases, with a variety of significant modifications. If that be so, it is equally arguable that very much the same result could be achieved by modifications to both the County Court and High Court rules without the need for universal sweeping changes.

Certainly all practitioners and judiciary are going to find that the next few years are full of challenge and interest. It will be fascinating to observe the changes and the outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. London, H.M.S.O., July 1996.

  2. Supra n.1, London, H.M.S.O., July 1996, at 2, Para. 22.

  3. Supra n.1, London, H.M.S.O., July 1996, at 12, Para 22.

  4. Supra n.1, London, H.M.S.O., July 1996, Recommendations 156–158, 167–168 and 171.

  5. Supra n.1, London, H.M.S.O., July 1996, Recommendation 291.

  6. Supra n.1, London, H.M.S.O., July 1996, Recommendations 295–298.

  7. Supra n.1, London, H.M.S.O., July 1996, Recommendation 79.

  8. Supra n.1, London, H.M.S.O., July 1996, Recommendation 78.

  9. Supra n.1, London, H.M.S.O., July 1996, Recommendation 87.

  10. Supra n.1, London, H.M.S.O., July 1996, Recommendation 92.

  11. Supra n.1, London, H.M.S.O., July 1996, Recommendations 174–186.

  12. “Woolf Report in Sheep's Clothing”,The Times, August 6th 1996, p.35.

  13. Supra n.1, London, H.M.S.O., July 1996, Recommendation 61.

  14. Supra n.1, London, H.M.S.O., July 1996, Recommendation 62.

  15. Supra n.1, London, H.M.S.O., July 1996, Recommendation 63.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Q.C., M.A., LL.M. (Cantab), J.D. (Chicago), one of Her Majesty's Circuit Judges since 1987. The opinions expressed in this article are purely personal to the author and should not be attributed to any other member of the judiciary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, D.M. Access to justice. Liverpool Law Rev 19, 37–45 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02810630

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02810630

Keywords

Navigation