Skip to main content
Log in

Three models of probation involvement with victims of crime

  • Published:
Liverpool Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. M. Kosh and B. Williams,The Probation Service and Victims of Crime: a Pilot Study (Keele: Keele University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Nettleton, S. Walklate and B. Williams,Probation Training with the Victim in Mind: Partnership, Values and Organisation (Keele: Keele University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Home Office,Victim's Charter (London: Home Office, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Victim's Charter, supra n.4, at 21. (London: Home Office, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Victim's Charter, supra n.4, at 21. (London: Home Office, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Home Office, Department of Health & Welsh Office,National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community (London: Home Office, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Home Office,Contact with Victims and Victims' Families (London: Home Office, Home Office Circular 77/94, 1994); Home Office, Department of Health and Welsh Office,National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community (London: Home Office, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Association of Chief Officers of Probation,Probation Services and Victims of Crime (Wakefield: Association of Chief Officers of Probation, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. W.D. Pithers, “Process evaluations of a group therapy component designed to enhance sex offenders' empathy for sexual abuse survivors”,Behaviour Research and Therapy 32 (1994), 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Supra n.1, at 14..

    Google Scholar 

  11. Supra n.1, at 15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Supra n.1, at 15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liberty,Briefing on the Sex Offenders Bill (London: Liberty, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Supra n.14..

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Johnston, “Throughcare Practice, Risk and Contact with Victims”, in H. Kemshall and J. Pritchard, eds.,Good Practice in Risk Assessment and Risk Management 2: Protection, Rights and Responsibilities (London: Jessica Kingsley, 1997), 288–300.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Reeves, “Double Indignity”,The Guardian, “Society” Supplement, 8 March 1995, p. 22; see also Nettleton et al,supra n.2, at 48.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Supra n.2, at 54.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Supra n.2., at 50.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Supra n.2, at 54.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Supra n. 19..

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Johnston, “Probation Contact with Victims—Challenging Throughcare Practice”,Probation Journal 42(1) (1996), 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Supra n.2, at 52.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Supra n.1, at 9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Supra n.2, at 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Supra n.16..

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Elias,Victims Still: the Political Manipulation of Crime Victims (London: Sage, 1993); R.I. Mawby and S. Walklate,Critical Victimology: International Perspectives (London: Sage, 1994); B. Williams, “The Victim's Charter: Citizens as Consumers of Criminal Justice Services”, paper to be given at conference on “Citizenship and the Welfare State: Fifty Years of Progress?”, Ruskin College, Oxford, December 1997 (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nettleton, H., Walklate, S. & Williams, B. Three models of probation involvement with victims of crime. Liverpool Law Rev 19, 203–217 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02810551

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02810551

Keywords

Navigation