Skip to main content
Log in

On the class of measurable cardinals without the axiom of choice

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using techniques of Gitik in conjunction with a large cardinal hypothesis whose consistency strength is strictly in between that of a supercompact and an almost huge cardinal, we obtain the relative consistency of the theory “ZF+⇁AC w+κ>ω is measurable iffκ is the successor of a singular cardinal”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Apter,On a problem inspired by determinacy, Israel J. Math.61 (1988), 256–270.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Apter,Some new upper bounds in consistency strength for certain choiceless large cardinal patterns, Arkiv. für Math. Logik31 (1992), 201–205.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Apter,Some results on consecutive large cardinals II: Applications of Radin forcing, Israel J. Math.52 (1985), 273–292.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Apter,Successors of singular cardinals and measurablity, Advances in Math.55 (1985), 228–241.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Apter,Successors of singular cardinals and measurablity revisited, J. Symbolic Logic55 (1990), 492–501.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Apter and J. Henle,Relative consistency results via strong compactness, Fundamenta Mathematicae139 (1991), 133–149.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Foreman and W. H. Woodin,The GCH can fail everywhere, Annals of Math.133 (1991), 1–36.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Gitik,All uncountable cardinals can be singular, Israel J. Math.35 (1980), 61–88.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Gitik,Regular cardinals in models ZF, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.290 (1985), 41–68.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Jech,ω 1 can be measurable, Israel J. Math.6 (1968), 363–367.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Jech,Set Theory, Academic Press, 1978.

  12. E. Kleinberg,Infinitary Combinatorics and the Axiom of Determinateness, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 612, Springer-Verlag, 1977.

  13. A. Lévy,Definability in Axiomatic Set Theory I, in: Y. Bar-Hillel, ed.,Logic, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science, North-Holland, 1965, pp. 127–151.

  14. A. Lévy and R. Solovay,Measurable cardinals and the continuum hypothesis, Israel J. Math.5 (1967), 234–248.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Menas,A combinatorial property of P k(λ), J. Symbolic Logic41 (1976), 225–233.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Takeuti,A Relativization of Strong Axiòms of Infinity to ω 1, Annals Japanese Assoc. Phil. Sci.3 (1970), 191–204.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Apter, A.W. On the class of measurable cardinals without the axiom of choice. Israel J. Math. 79, 367–379 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02808226

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02808226

Keywords

Navigation