Skip to main content
Log in

Indirect portography enhanced by nicardipine versus prostaglandin E1

  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To compare nicardipine (NCR) and prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) for portal venous contrast enhancement on indirect portography in a retrospective study.

Methods: One milligram of NCR, a calcium antagonist, was injected into the superior mesenteric artery just prior to portography in 18 patients who had undergone otherwise identical portography using 20 μg PGE136-279 (mean 133) days before. All 18 patients had liver tumors and showed no changes in portal vein status in the interim.

Results: Using conventional film/screen angiography, NCR provided equally good portograms as PGE1 with respect to image density and image contrast. Systemic effects on blood pressure and heart rate were minimal and no other side effects were observed with NCR.

Conclusion: NCR is an inexpensive drug and is expected to provide well-contrasted, indirect portograms on conventional film/screen ansiography

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Takenaka T, Usuda S, Nomura T, Maeno H, Sado T (1976) Vasodilator profile of a new 1,4-dihydropyridine derivative, 2,6-dimethyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-l,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylic acid 3-[2-(N-benzyl-N-methylamino)]-ethyl ester 5-methyl ester hydrochloride (YC-93). Arzneimittelforschung 26:2172–2192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis LJ, Anderson JH, Wallace S, Gianturco C, Jacobson ED (1975) The use of prostagiandin E, to enhance the angiographic visualization of the splanchnic circulation. Radiology 114:281–286

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cho KJ, Chuang VP, Reuter SR(1975) Prostagiandin E1 as a pharmacoangiographic agent for arterial portography. Radiology 116:207–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jonsson K, Wallace S, Jacobson ED, Anderson JH, Zornoza J, Granmaye M(1977) The use of prostagiandin E1 for enhanced visualization of the splanchnic circulation. Radiology 125:373 -378

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark RA, Colley DP, Jacobson ED, Herman R, Tyler G, Stahl D (1980) Superior mesenteric angiography and blood flow measurement following intra-arterial injection of prostagiandin E1. Radiology 134:327–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gustafson T, Hedner P, Ingelmansson S (1982) Prostagiandin E1 effect on human splanchnic circulation at different dose levels. Invest Radiol 17:249–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ito T, Itoshima T, Ukida M, Kiyotoshi S, Kawaguchi K, Ogawa H, Hattori S, Kitadai M, Nagashima H (1982) Enhanced visualization of the portal vein system in superior mesenteric arterial portography using prostaslandin E1. Acta Med Okayama 36:291–297

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Inoue Y, Nakamura H, Ogura Y, Yamasaki K (1993) Transarterial portography via superior mesenteric artery using nicardipine. Rinsho Hoshasen 38:341–344(In Japanese, English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yamamoto M, Ohta T, Toda N (1983) Mechanisms of relaxant action of nicardipine, a new Ca++-antagonist, on isolated dog cerebral and mesenteric arteries. Stroke 14:270–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell BC, Kelman AW, Hills WS (1985) Noninvasive assessment of the haemodynamic effects of nicardipine in normotensive subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 20(suppl):55S-61S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rousseau MF, Etienne J, Van Mechelen H, Veriter C, Pouleur H (1984) Haemodynamic and cardiac effects of nicardipine in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 6:833–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lambert CR, Hill JA, Nichols WW, Feldman RL, Pepine CJ (1985) Coronary and systemic hemodynamic effects of nicardipine. Am J Cardiol 55:652–656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Silke B, Verma SR, Hafizullah M, Reynolds G, Frais MA, Jackson NC, Taylor SH (1984) Haemodynamic effects of nicardipine in acute myocardial infarction. Postgrad Med J 60(suppl 4):29–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seki T, Takenaka T (1977) Pharmacological evaluation of YC-93, a new vasodilator, in healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm 15:267–274

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Takenaka T, Handa J (1979) Cerebrovascular effects of YC-93, a new vasodilator, in dogs, monkeys and human patients. Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm 17:1–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baba T, Boku A, Ishizaki T, Sone K, Takebe K(1986) Renal effects of nicardipine in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Am Heart J 111:552–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baba T, Ishizaki T, Ido Y, Aoyagi K, Murabayashi S, Takebe K (1986) Renal effects of nicardipine, a calcium entry blocker, in hypertensive type II diabetic patients with nephropathy. Diabetes 35:1206–1214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Higuchi S, Shiobara Y (1980) Comparative pharmacokinetics of nicardipine hydrochloride, a new vasodilator, in various species. Xenobiotica 6:447–454

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rossi P, Simonetti G, Passariello R, Tempesta P, Pesce B, Pavone P, Castrucci M (1985) Digital celiac angiography. Radiology 154:229–231

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Foley WD, Stewart ET, Milbrath JR, SanDretto M, Milde M (1983) Digital subtraction angiography of the portal venous system. AJRl40:497–499

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yashiro N, Ohtomo K, Furui S, Kokubo T, Irai Y, Iio M(1984) The role of intraarterial digital subtraction arteriography in visceral angiography. Nippon Acta Radiologica 44:1366–1373 (In Japanese, English abstract)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Michels NA (1955) Blood supply and anatomy of the upper abdominal organs. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 152-154

  23. Soyer P, Lacheheb D, Levesque M (1993) CT arterial portography of the abdomen: Effect of injecting papaverine into the mesenteric artery on hepatic contrast enhancement. AJR 160:1213–1215

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Graf O, Dock WL Lammer J, Thurnher S, Eibenberger KL, Wilding R, Niederle B, Lang EK, Lechner G (1994) Determination of optimal time window for liver scanning with CT during arterial portography. Radiology 190:43–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Redman HC, Reuter SR, Miller VVJ(1969) improvement of superior mesenteric and portal vein visualization with tolazoline. Invest Radiol 4:24–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Widrich WC, Nordahl DL, Robbins AH (1974) Contrast enhancement of the mesenteric and portal veins using intraarterial papaverine. AJR 121:374–379

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu LC, Wu CC Liu LH, Chiang CP, Huang CH, Chou YH, Tan LB (1991) Comparison of the effects of papaverine versus prostaglandin E1 on penile blood flow by color duplex sonography. Eur Urol 19:49–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inoue, Y., Nakamura, H., Akaji, H. et al. Indirect portography enhanced by nicardipine versus prostaglandin E1 . Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 18, 92–96 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02807229

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02807229

Key words

Navigation