Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 22–39 | Cite as

Third party roles in intimate partner violence incidents and their effects on police response in a statewide rural jurisdiction

  • Stan Shernock
Article

Abstract

Using police narratives and affidavits, as well as incident report forms, this paper examines the neglected research topic of third party involvement in intimate partner violence and reports findings that differ from previous research done on the subject as a secondary topic. After identifying two analytically distinct roles of third parties, those of complainant and eyewitness, the study finds that the presence of complainants and eyewitnesses alone has no effect on police arrest dispositions. However, arrest is increased significantly when eyewitnesses become complainants or provide sworn statements. Other mafor findings of the study were: (1) the importance of the heretofore disregarded role of family members as third party witnesses; (2) the relative insignificance of marital status among cohabiting victim-offender couples on reporting and disposition; (3) the relatively small percentage of witnesses who are victimized; and (4) the greater willingness of witnesses to provide sworn statements against offenders with past versus current relationships to the victim.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, T., & Buzawa, E. (1993). Determining police responses to domestic violence victims: The role of victim preference.Am. Beh. Scientist 36, 610–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachman, R., & Coker, A.L. (1995). Police involvement in domestic violence: The interactive effects of victim injury, offender's history of violence, and race.Violence and Victims 10, 96–106.Google Scholar
  3. Berk, R., Berk, S., Newton, P., & Loseke, D. (1984). Cops on call: Summoning the police to the scene of spousal abuse.Law and Society Review 18, 479–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berk, R., & Loseke, D. (1980–1981). Handling family violence: Situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbances.Law and Society Review 15, 317–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brosnan, D. (1992). Perceptions of bystander willingness to intervene on behalf of victims of assaults: Implications for the development of co-productive strategies.Criminal Justice Policy Review 6(1), 40–54.Google Scholar
  6. Buzawa, E., & Buzawa, C. (1993). Opening the doors: The changing police response to domestic violence. In R. Dunham, R. & Alpert, G. (Eds.),Critical issues in policing (2nd ed., pp. 551–567). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
  7. Buzawa, E., & Buzawa, C. (2001). Traditional and innovative police responses to domestic violence. In Dunham, R., & Alpert, G. (Eds.),Critical issues in policing (4th ed., pp. 216–237). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
  8. Buzawa, E., Hotaling, G., Klein, A., & Byrne, J. (1999).Response to domestic violence in a proactive court setting: Final report. National Institute of Justice of the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. Felson, R., & Ackerman, J. (2001). Arrests for domestic and other assaults.Criminology 39, 655–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Felson, R., Messner, S., & Hoskin, A. (1999). The victim-offender relationship and calling the police in assaults.Criminology 37 (4), 931–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoefnagels, C., & Zwikker, M. (2001). The bystander dilemma and child abuse: Extending the Latane and Darley model to domestic violence.Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31, 1158–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoyle, C., & Sanders A. (2000). Police response to domestic violence: From victim choice to victim empowerment.British Journal of Criminology 40, 14–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hutchinson, I., & Hirschel, J.D. (2001). Effects of children's presence on woman abuse.Violence and Victims 16, 3–17.Google Scholar
  14. Laner, M., Benin, M., & Ventrone, N. (2001). Bystander attitudes toward victims of violence: Who's worth helping?Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal 22, 23–42.Google Scholar
  15. Mignon, S. & Holmes, W. (1995). Police response to mandatory arrest laws.Crime and Delinquency 41, 430–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Planty, M. (2002).Third-party involvement in violent crime, 1993–99 (NCJ 189100). Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report (July). 1–7.Google Scholar
  17. Robinson, A., & Chandek, M. (2000) The domestic violence arrest decision: Examining demographic, attitudinal, and situational variables.Crime and Delinquency 43, 104–118.Google Scholar
  18. Stalans, L. (1996). Family harmony or individual protection? Recommendations about how policy can handle domestic violence situations.Am. Beh. Scientist 39 (4), 433–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vermont State Police. (1998)Vermont State Police rules and regulations, operational policies and procedures, Section V, Chapter 5, Article V111, 4.1 (A) (5).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Police and Criminal Psychology 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stan Shernock
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Justice Studies, and SociologyNorwich UniversityNorthfield

Personalised recommendations