Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Co-occurring graminoid and forb species do not differ in their root morphological response to soil heterogeneity

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We measured the proliferation of roots into experimental nutrient patches in a grassland community, distinguishing roots of graminoids and forbs.

Biomass, length, and specific length were estimated for roots of each of the two functional groups, collected from patches differing in nutrient concentration, and established at four different times during a season. The ratio of graminoid and forb roots was compared with the graminoid-forb ratio in the above-ground biomass.

Plant roots proliferated more intensively into patches with higher nutrient concentration, but the roots of the two functional groups had a similar ability to target richer patches. Relative proportion of graminoids was higher below-ground than above-ground and changed during the season, being lowest after mowing. Specific root length was higher for graminoid species, but did not respond to nutrient concentration in patches for either functional group.

This is the first study to provide comparative information about root morphological response for graminoids and forbs, measured in a real, semi-natural plant community. The study shows no significant overall difference in the ability of these two functional types to place roots into nutrient-rich patches, but indicates other important differences among the two functional groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (2003):WinRHIZO 2003b. Basic, Reg & Pro. Régent Instruments Inc., Sainte-Foy.

  • Arredondo J.T. &Johnson D.A. (1999): Root architecture and biomass allocation of three range grasses in response to nonuniform supply of nutrients and shoot defoliation.New Phytol. 143: 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilbrough C.J. &Caldwell M.M. (1995): The effects of shading and N status on root proliferation in nutrient patches by the perennial grassAgropyron desertorum in the field.Oecologia 103: 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns I.G. (1991): Short- and long-term effects of a change in the spatial distribution of nitrate in the root zone on nitrogen uptake, growth and root development of young lettuce plants.Pl. Cell Environm. 14: 21–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell M.M. (1994): Exploiting nutrients in fertile soil microsites. In:Caldwell M.M. &Pearcy R.W. (eds.),Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants: ecophysiological processes above- and below-ground, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 325–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell M.M., Manwaring J.H. &Durham S.L. (1996): Species interactions at the level of fine roots in the field: influence of soil nutrient heterogeneity and plant size.Oecologia 106: 440–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell B.D., Grime J.P. &Mackey J.M.L. (1991): A trade-off between scale and precision in resource foraging.Oecologia 87: 532–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craine J.M., Froehle J., Tilman D.G., Wedin D.A. &Chapin F.S. (2001): The relationship among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients.Oikos 93: 274–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui M. &Caldwell M.M. (1996): Facilitation of plant phosphate acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizas from enriched soil patches. I. Roots and hyphae exploiting the same soil volume.New Phytol. 133: 453–460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day K.J., Hutchings M.J. &John E.A. (2003): The effects of spatial pattern of nutrient supply on yield, structure and mortality in plant populations.J. Ecol. 91: 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eissenstat D.M. &Caldwell M.M. (1988): Seasonal timing of root growth in favourable microsites.Ecology 69: 870–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley R.A. &Fitter A.H. (1999a): Temporal and spatial variation in soil resources in a deciduous woodland.J. Ecol. 87: 688–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley R.A. &Fitter A.H. (1999b): The response of seven co-occurring woodland herbaceous perennials to localized nutrient-rich patches.J. Ecol. 87: 849–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitter A.H. (1986): Spatial and temporal patterns of root activity in a species-rich alluvial grassland.Oecologia 69: 594–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitter A.H., Williamson L., Linkohr B. &Leyser O. (2002): Root system architecture determines fitness in anArabidopsis mutant in competition for immobile phosphate ions but not for nitrate ions.Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 269: 2017–2022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fransen B., De Kroon H. &Berendse F. (1998): Root morphological plasticity and nutrient acquisition of perennial grass species from habitats of different nutrient availability.Oecologia 115: 351–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P. (1994): The role of plasticity in exploiting environmental heterogeneity. In:Caldwell M.M. &Pearcy R.W. (eds.),Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants: ecophysiological processes above- and below-ground, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross K.L., Peters A. &Pregitzer K.S. (1993): Fine root growth and demographic responses to nutrient patches in four old-field plant species.Oecologia 95: 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel D. &Leuschner C. (2002): A comparison of four different fine root production estimates with ecosystem carbon balance data in aFagus-Quercus mixed forest.Pl. & Soil 239: 237–251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A. (2004): The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients.New Phytol. 162: 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A., Stewart J., Robinson D., Griffiths B.S. &Fitter A.H. (1998): Root proliferation, soil fauna and plant nitrogen capture from nutrient-rich patches in soil.New Phytol. 139: 479–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A., Robinson D., Griffiths B.S. &Fitter A.H. (1999): Why plants bother: root proliferation results in increased nitrogen capture from an organic patch when two grasses compete.Pl. Cell. Environm. 22: 811–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A., Stewart J., Robinson D., Griffiths B.S. &Fitter A.H. (2000): Competition between roots and soil micro-organisms for nutrients from nitrogen-rich patches of varying complexity.J. Ecol. 88: 150–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber-Sannwald E., Pyke D.A., Caldwell M.M. &Durham S. (1998): Effects of nutrient patches and root systems on the clonal plasticity of a rhizomatous grass.Ecology 79: 2267–2280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings M.J., John E.A. &Wijsinghe D.K. (2003): Towards understanding the consequences of soil heterogeneity for plant populations and communities.Ecology 84: 2322–2334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings M.J. &John E.A. (2004): The effects of environmental heterogeneity on root growth and root/shoot partitioning.Ann. Bot. (Oxford) 94: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson L.E., Schimel J.P. &Jackson M.K. (1989): Short-term partitioning of ammonium and nitrate between plants and microbes in an annual grassland.Soil Biol. Biochem. 21: 409–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R.B. &Caldwell M.M. (1993): Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plants.J. Ecol. 81: 683–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joslin J.D. &Wolfe M.H. (1999): Disturbances during minirhizotron installation can affect root observation data.Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 63: 218–221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kubát K. et al. (2002):Klíč ke květeně České republiky (Key to the Flora of the Czech Republic). Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepik M., Liira J. &Zobel K. (2004): The space-use strategy of plants with different growth forms, in a field experiment with manipulated nutrients and light.Folia Geobot. 39: 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levang-Brilz N. &Biondini M.E. (2002): Growth rate, root development and nutrient uptake of 55 plant species from the Great Plains Grasslands, USA.Pl. Ecol. 165: 117–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill C. (1992): Comparison of soil coring and ingrowth methods for measuring below-ground production.Ecology 73: 1918–1921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecháčková S., During H.J., Rydlová V. &Herben T. (1999): Species-specific spatial pattern of below-ground plant parts in a montane grassland community.J. Ecol. 87: 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaniemi T.J. &Reynolds H.L. (2004): Root foraging for patchy resources in eight herbaceous plant species.Oecologia 141: 519–525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D. (2001): Root proliferation, nitrate inflow and their carbon costs during nitrogen capture by competing plants in patchy soil.Pl. Soil 232: 41–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D. &Rorison I.H. (1983): A comparison of the responses ofLolium perenne L.,Holcus lanatus L. andDeschampsia flexuosa (L.)Trin. to a localized supply of nitrogen.New Phytol. 94: 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D. &van Vuuren M.M.I. (1998): Responses of wild plants to nutrient patches in relation to growth rate and life-form. In:Lambers H., Poorter H. &van Vuuren M.M.I. (eds.),Variation in plant growth, Backhuys, Leiden, pp. 237–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinning S. &Weiner J. (1998): Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants.Oecologia 113: 447–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields J.A., Paul E.A. &Lowe W.E. (1973): Turnover of microbial tissue in soil under field conditions.Soil Biol. Biochem. 5: 753–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šmilauerová M. (2001): Plant root response to heterogeneity of soil resources: effects of nutrient patches, AM symbiosis, and species composition.Folia Geobot. 36: 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šmilauerová M. &Šmilauer P. (2002): Morphological responses of plant roots to heterogeneity of soil resources.New Phytol. 154: 703–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steingrobe B., Schmid H. &Claassen N. (2001): The use of the ingrowth core method for measuring root production of arable crops — influence of soil and root disturbance during installation of the bags on root ingrowth into the cores.Eur. J. Agron. 15: 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vuuren M.M.I., Robinson D. &Griffiths B.S. (1996): Nutrient inflow and root proliferation during the exploitation of a temporally and spatially discrete source of nitrogen in soil.Pl. & Soil 178: 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijesinghe D.K., John E.A. &Hutchings M.J. (2005): Does pattern of soil resource heterogeneity determine plant community structure? An experimental investigation.J. Ecol. 93: 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H., Jennings A., Barlow P.W. &Forde B.G. (1999): Dual pathways for regulation of root branching by nitrate.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 6529–6534.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ-370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

    Marie Šmilauerová & Petr Šmilauer

Authors
  1. Marie Šmilauerová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Petr Šmilauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Šmilauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Šmilauerová, M., Šmilauer, P. Co-occurring graminoid and forb species do not differ in their root morphological response to soil heterogeneity. Folia Geobot 41, 121–135 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02806474

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02806474

Keywords

Nomenclature

Search

Navigation