Advertisement

Folia Geobotanica

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 377–390 | Cite as

Patterns of pollinator-generated fruit set inOrchis morio (Orchidaceae)

  • Jana Jersáková
  • Pavel Kindlmann
Article

Abstract

Reproductive success of a deceptive species,Orchis morio, was investigated in relation to floral display, vertical position of fruits and dispersion pattern. A caging experiment confirmed the necessity of the presence of insect vectors for fruit development. In two Czech populations studied in 1997, insect-pollinated plants had on average 27.3 and 38% fruit set, compared to 96.7% for flowers pollinated by hand. Floral display (number of flowers per spike) was expected to positively affect the probability of pollinator visit. However, fruit set (number of fruits per spike) did not increase linearly with increasing floral display, but rose sigmoidally and approached an asymptotic value. Floral display enhanced reproductive success (fruit/flower ratio) up to a certain number of flowers (11–14), above which the relationship started to decrease and only increased the probability of production of at least one fruit. We also studied the effect of flower position within an inflorescence on the probability of being pollinated and we counted the number of seeds per capsule. A rapid decline in fruit set from the bottom to the top of the inflorescence observed probably reflects the behaviour of pollinators. The number of seeds per one capsule varied from 550 to 12 270. In addition, individuals growing in large clumps or isolated had lower reproductive success than those growing in small clumps. This result implies the existence of an intraspecific competition for pollinators and on the other hand inability of isolated individuals to attract a large number of pollinators.

Keywords

Czech Republic Deception Floral display Fruit set Reproductive success 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman J.D. (1981): Pollination biology ofCalypso bulbosa var.occidentalis (Orchidaceae): A food deception scheme.Madroño 28: 101–110.Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman J.D. (1986): Mechanisms and evolution of food-deceptive pollination systems in orchids.Lindleyana 1: 108–113.Google Scholar
  3. Ackerman J.D. (1989): Limitations to sexual reproduction inEncyclia krugii (Orchidaceae).Syst. Bot. 14: 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ackerman J.D. &Montalvo A.M. (1990): Short- and long-term limitations to fruit production in a tropical orchid.Ecology 71: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyden T.C. (1982): The pollination biology ofCalypso bulbosa var.americana (Orchidaceae): Initial deception of bumblebee visitors.Oecologia 55: 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calvo R.N. (1990): Inflorescence size and fruit distribution among individuals in three orchid species.Amer. J. Bot. 77: 1378–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark C.W. (1976):Mathematical bioeconomics. The optimal management of renewable resources. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Dafni A. &Ivri Y. (1979): Pollination ecology of and hybridization betweenOrchis coriophora L. andO. collina Sol. exRuss. (Orchidaceae) in Israel.New Phytol. 83: 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dafni A. &Ivri Y. (1981): Floral mimicry betweenOrchis israelitica Baumann andDafni (Orchidaceae) andBellevalia flexuosa Boiss. (Liliaceae).Oecologia 49: 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daumann E. (1941): Die anbohrbaren Gewebe und rudimentären Nektarien in den Blütenregion.Beih. Bot. Centralbl. Abt. A. 61: 11–82.Google Scholar
  11. Delforge P. (1995):Orchids of Britain & Europe. Harper Collins Publishers, London.Google Scholar
  12. Firmage D.H. &Cole F.R. (1988): Reproductive success and inflorescence size ofCalopogon tuberosus (Orchidaceae).Amer. J. Bot. 75: 1371–1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Janzen D.H. et al. (1980): Self- and cross-pollination ofEncyclia cordigera (Orchidaceae) in Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica.Biotropica 12: 72–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jersáková J. (1996):Ekologické nároky Orchis morio (Ecological demands of Orchis morio). BSc. thesis, Biologická fakulta Jihočeské univerzity, České Budějovice.Google Scholar
  15. Montalvo A.M. &Ackerman J.D. (1987): Limitations to fruit production inlonopsis utricularioides.Biotropica 19: 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moravec J. (1983):Rostlinná společenstva ČSSR a jejich ohrožení (Red list of plant communities of the Czech Socialist Republic and their endangerment). Severočeskou přírodou, Litoměřice.Google Scholar
  17. Nilsson L.A. (1980): The pollination ecology ofDactylorhiza sambucina (Orchidaceae).Bot. Not. 133: 367–385.Google Scholar
  18. Nilsson L.A. (1983): Anthecology ofOrchis mascula (Orchidaceae).Nordic J. Bot. 3: 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nilsson L.A. (1984): Anthecology ofOrchis morio (Orchidaceae) and its outpost in the North.Nova Acta Regiae Soc. Sci. Upsal. 3: 167–180.Google Scholar
  20. Nilsson L.A. (1992a): Orchid pollination biology.Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nilsson L.A. (1992b): Animal pollinators adjust plant gender in relation to floral display: evidence fromOrchis morio (Orchidaceae).Evol. Trends Pl. 6: 33–40.Google Scholar
  22. Primack R.B. &Hall P. (1990): Cost of reproduction in the pink lady’s slipper orchid: a four year experimental study.Amer. Naturalist 136: 638–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Procházka F. &Velísek V. (1983):Orchideje naší přírody (Orchids of our wilderness). Academia, Praha.Google Scholar
  24. Rathcke B. (1983): Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. In:Real L. (ed.),Pollination biology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 305–329.Google Scholar
  25. Real L. (1983): Microbehaviour and macrostructure in pollinator plant interactions. In:Real L. (ed.),Pollination ecology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 287–302.Google Scholar
  26. Sabat A.M. &Ackerman J.D. (1996): Fruit set in a deceptive orchid: the effect of flowering phenology, display size, and local floral abundance.Amer. J. Bot. 83: 1181–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schemske D.W. (1980): Evolution of floral display in the orchidBrassavola nodosa.Evolution 34: 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sprengel C.K. (1793):Das entdeckte Geheimnis der Natur im Bau und in der Befruchtung der Blumen. BerlinGoogle Scholar
  29. Tamm C.O. (1972): Survival and flowering of some perennial herbs. II. The behaviour of some orchids on permanent plots.Oikos 23: 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van der Cingel N.A. (1995):An atlas of orchid pollination. European orchids. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  31. Willems J.H. &Ellers J. (1996): Plant performance and population characteristics ofOrchis simia (Orchidaceae) in two extremes of its distribution area.Flora 191: 41–48.Google Scholar
  32. Willems J.H. &Lahtinen M.L. (1997): Impact of pollination and resource limitation on seed production in a border population ofSpiranthes spiralis (Orchidaceae).Acta Bot. Neerl. 46: 365–375.Google Scholar
  33. Zar J.H. (1984):Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  34. Zimmerman J.K. &Aide T.M. (1989): Patterns of fruit production in a Neotropical orchid: pollinator vs. resource limitation.Amer. J. Bot. 76: 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jana Jersáková
    • 1
  • Pavel Kindlmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Biological SciencesUniversity of South BohemiaČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations